Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1460889

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression

From Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Date 2016-08-12 03:30 +0200
Message-ID <s59sl-3pL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <s2uCZ-41d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2uWm-49j-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2w25-4Tj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2xAS-66I-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s577b-1Km-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Kim,
> 
> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >>
> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
> >
> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7.  We
> > will implement it.
> >
> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >
> > The disk is one 48G ram disk.  The steps for aim7 is,
> >
> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> > FILESIZE: 1M
> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> > 10 disk_cp
> > EOF
> >
> > (
> > 	echo $HOSTNAME
> > 	echo disk_cp
> >
> > 	echo 1
> > 	echo 3000
> > 	echo 2
> > 	echo 3000
> > 	echo 1
> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >
> >
> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >
> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
> > steps for aim7 is,
> >
> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> > FILESIZE: 1M
> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> > 10 sync_disk_rw
> > EOF
> >
> > (
> > 	echo $HOSTNAME
> > 	echo sync_disk_rw
> >
> > 	echo 1
> > 	echo 600
> > 	echo 2
> > 	echo 600
> > 	echo 1
> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> 
> Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
> to reproduce?

Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
I'll check that when back to US.

Thanks,

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-08-12 01:00 +0200
  Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3%  regression Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2016-08-12 03:30 +0200
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 19:00 +0200

csiph-web