Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454386 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
Last post2016-08-03 04:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2016-08-03 04:40 +0200

#1454386 — [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1I5k-54A-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
index 67392b6..ebd3723 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 /* Allow Guests to use a non-128 (ie. non-Linux) syscall trap. */
 static unsigned int syscall_vector = IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR;
-module_param(syscall_vector, uint, 0444);
+module_param(syscall_vector, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /* The address of the interrupt handler is split into two bits: */
 static unsigned long idt_address(u32 lo, u32 hi)
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1455586

FromRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date2016-08-03 04:40 +0200
Message-ID<s1Ug9-4Hs-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1454386
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> writes:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

I find the numbers far, far more readable.

Cheers,
Rusty.

>  /* Allow Guests to use a non-128 (ie. non-Linux) syscall trap. */
>  static unsigned int syscall_vector = IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR;
> -module_param(syscall_vector, uint, 0444);
> +module_param(syscall_vector, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  
>  /* The address of the interrupt handler is split into two bits: */
>  static unsigned long idt_address(u32 lo, u32 hi)
> -- 
> 2.9.2

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web