Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454558 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 16:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 23:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1038/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1038/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-08-02 23:20 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 16:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1038/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1IRJ-5C1-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> --- fs/ext4/crypto.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c index 6a6c273..40877aa 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c +++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static unsigned int num_prealloc_crypto_pages = 32; static unsigned int num_prealloc_crypto_ctxs = 128; -module_param(num_prealloc_crypto_pages, uint, 0444); +module_param(num_prealloc_crypto_pages, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_prealloc_crypto_pages, "Number of crypto pages to preallocate"); -module_param(num_prealloc_crypto_ctxs, uint, 0444); +module_param(num_prealloc_crypto_ctxs, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_prealloc_crypto_ctxs, "Number of crypto contexts to preallocate"); -- 2.9.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1Pgt-1Bc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1454558 |
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:10:47PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. I actually find using the macros significantly **decrease* the readiability of the code. A quick glance at 0644 quickly tells you what the permissions are. Parsing S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH takes longer, and is more error prone. NACK. - Ted
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web