Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1454175 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 14:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-02 16:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0987/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0987/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2016-08-02 16:50 +0200
| From | Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 14:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0987/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro |
| Message-ID | <s1HiW-4uK-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
index a72e8d6..4ed75c6 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static ssize_t twl6030_usb_vbus_show(struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, 0444, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, NULL);
static irqreturn_t twl6030_usb_irq(int irq, void *_twl)
{
--
2.9.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-02 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s1Jb3-5Jj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1454175 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> writes: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, > and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, > thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> > --- > drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c > index a72e8d6..4ed75c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static ssize_t twl6030_usb_vbus_show(struct device *dev, > > return ret; > } > -static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, 0444, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, NULL); > +static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, NULL); line too long -- balbi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web