Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454249 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Started byBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
First post2016-08-02 15:10 +0200
Last post2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 15:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> - 2016-08-02 15:40 +0200

#1454249 — [PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

FromBaole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date2016-08-02 15:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Message-ID<s1HCi-4RK-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
index 71a0613..3390b4e 100644
--- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
+++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS]	= SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
 unsigned int snd_efw_resp_buf_size	= 1024;
 bool snd_efw_resp_buf_debug		= false;
 
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "card index");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "enable Fireworks sound card");
-module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, 0444);
+module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_size,
 		 "response buffer size (max 4096, default 1024)");
-module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, 0444);
+module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_debug, "store all responses to buffer");
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(devices_mutex);
-- 
2.9.2

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1454404

FromTakashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Date2016-08-02 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<s1I5l-54A-97@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1454249
On Aug 2 2016 21:22, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>

> ---
>  sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
> index 71a0613..3390b4e 100644
> --- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
> +++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
> @@ -27,16 +27,16 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS]	= SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
>  unsigned int snd_efw_resp_buf_size	= 1024;
>  bool snd_efw_resp_buf_debug		= false;
>  
> -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
> +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "card index");
> -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
> +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string");
> -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
> +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "enable Fireworks sound card");
> -module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, 0444);
> +module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_size,
>  		 "response buffer size (max 4096, default 1024)");
> -module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, 0444);
> +module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_debug, "store all responses to buffer");
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(devices_mutex);
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web