Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1454249

[PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

From Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date 2016-08-02 15:10 +0200
Message-ID <s1HCi-4RK-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
index 71a0613..3390b4e 100644
--- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
+++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.c
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@ static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS]	= SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
 unsigned int snd_efw_resp_buf_size	= 1024;
 bool snd_efw_resp_buf_debug		= false;
 
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "card index");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "enable Fireworks sound card");
-module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, 0444);
+module_param_named(resp_buf_size, snd_efw_resp_buf_size, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_size,
 		 "response buffer size (max 4096, default 1024)");
-module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, 0444);
+module_param_named(resp_buf_debug, snd_efw_resp_buf_debug, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(resp_buf_debug, "store all responses to buffer");
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(devices_mutex);
-- 
2.9.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> - 2016-08-02 15:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> - 2016-08-02 15:40 +0200

csiph-web