Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1452824 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Amit Tomer <amittomer25@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-31 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-31 15:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/3] phy: sun4i: add support for A64 usb phy Amit Tomer <amittomer25@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:00 +0200
| From | Amit Tomer <amittomer25@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] phy: sun4i: add support for A64 usb phy |
| Message-ID | <s0Yvv-bq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello ,
> @@ -264,6 +266,12 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_init(struct phy *_phy)
> val = readl(phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
> writel(val & ~2, phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
> } else {
> + /* A64 needs also this unknown bit */
> + if (data->cfg->type == sun50i_a64_phy) {
> + val = readl(phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
> + writel(val & ~2, phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
> + }
> +
This bit is also set for H3, shall we reuse it or we should enclose it
in else-if part ?
Thanks
Amit.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web