Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1401831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-20 08:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 11 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 6/7] locking,s390: Remove s390 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 7/7] locking,asm-generic: Remove generic rwsem add and rwsem update definitions Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 5/7] locking,ia64: Remove ia64 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 1/7] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock by reducing operations in slowpath Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 3/7] locking,x86: Remove x86 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: Convert sem->count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 03:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-17 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-05-20 08:30 +0200
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t |
| Message-ID | <rzBmV-5OI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The first patch contains an optimization for acquiring the rwsem write lock
in the slowpath.
This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 42 --------------------------------
arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 ------
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 37 -----------------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 --------------
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 16 -------------
include/linux/rwsem.h | 6 ++---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 6/7] locking,s390: Remove s390 rwsem add and rwsem update |
| Message-ID | <rzBmV-5OI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
The rwsem count has been converted to an atomic variable and the rwsem
code now directly uses atomic_long_add() and atomic_long_add_return(),
so we can remove the s390 implementation of rwsem_atomic_add() and
rwsem_atomic_update().
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 37 -------------------------------------
1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
index c75e447..597e7e9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -207,41 +207,4 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- signed long old, new;
-
- asm volatile(
- " lg %0,%2\n"
- "0: lgr %1,%0\n"
- " agr %1,%4\n"
- " csg %0,%1,%2\n"
- " jl 0b"
- : "=&d" (old), "=&d" (new), "=Q" (sem->count)
- : "Q" (sem->count), "d" (delta)
- : "cc", "memory");
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- signed long old, new;
-
- asm volatile(
- " lg %0,%2\n"
- "0: lgr %1,%0\n"
- " agr %1,%4\n"
- " csg %0,%1,%2\n"
- " jl 0b"
- : "=&d" (old), "=&d" (new), "=Q" (sem->count)
- : "Q" (sem->count), "d" (delta)
- : "cc", "memory");
- return new;
-}
-
#endif /* _S390_RWSEM_H */
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 7/7] locking,asm-generic: Remove generic rwsem add and rwsem update definitions |
| Message-ID | <rzBmV-5OI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
The rwsem count has been converted to an atomic variable and we
now directly use atomic_long_add() and atomic_long_add_return()
on the count, so we can remove the asm-generic implementation of
rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update().
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
---
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index 3fc94a0..dd9db88 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -107,14 +107,6 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- atomic_long_add(delta, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
-}
-
-/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -134,13 +126,5 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return atomic_long_add_return(delta, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
-}
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_RWSEM_H */
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 5/7] locking,ia64: Remove ia64 rwsem add and rwsem update |
| Message-ID | <rzBmV-5OI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
The rwsem count has been converted to an atomic variable and the rwsem code now directly uses atomic_long_add() and atomic_long_add_return(), so we can remove the ia64 implementation of rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update(). Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> --- arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h index 8b23e07..dfd5895 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h @@ -151,11 +151,4 @@ __downgrade_write (struct rw_semaphore *sem) rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem); } -/* - * Implement atomic add functionality. These used to be "inline" functions, but GCC v3.1 - * doesn't quite optimize this stuff right and ends up with bad calls to fetchandadd. - */ -#define rwsem_atomic_add(delta, sem) atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&(sem)->count)) -#define rwsem_atomic_update(delta, sem) atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&(sem)->count)) - #endif /* _ASM_IA64_RWSEM_H */ -- 2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 1/7] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock by reducing operations in slowpath |
| Message-ID | <rzBmW-5OI-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
When acquiring the rwsem write lock in the slowpath, we first try
to set count to RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS. When that is successful,
we then atomically add the RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS in cases where
there are other tasks on the wait list. This causes write lock
operations to often issue multiple atomic operations.
We can instead make the list_is_singular() check first, and then
set the count accordingly, so that we issue at most 1 atomic
operation when acquiring the write lock and reduce unnecessary
cacheline contention.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 09e30c6..296d421 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -255,17 +255,28 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
+/*
+ * This function must be called with the sem->wait_lock held to prevent
+ * race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
+ * sem->count accordingly.
+ */
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
/*
- * Try acquiring the write lock. Check count first in order
- * to reduce unnecessary expensive cmpxchg() operations.
+ * Avoid trying to acquire write lock if count isn't RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS.
*/
- if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
- cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS,
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
- if (!list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
- rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
+ if (count != RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Acquire the lock by trying to set it to ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS. If there
+ * are other tasks on the wait list, we need to add on WAITING_BIAS.
+ */
+ count = list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list) ?
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS :
+ RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+
+ if (cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, count) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
rwsem_set_owner(sem);
return true;
}
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 3/7] locking,x86: Remove x86 rwsem add and rwsem update |
| Message-ID | <rzBmW-5OI-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
The rwsem count has been converted to an atomic variable and the rwsem
code now directly uses atomic_long_add() and atomic_long_add_return(),
so we can remove the x86 implementation of rwsem_atomic_add() and
rwsem_atomic_update().
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ------------------
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
index d2f8d10..91cf42c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -215,23 +215,5 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
: "memory", "cc");
}
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX _ASM_ADD "%1,%0"
- : "+m" (sem->count)
- : "er" (delta));
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return delta + xadd(&sem->count, delta);
-}
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_RWSEM_H */
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: Convert sem->count to atomic_long_t |
| Message-ID | <rzBmW-5OI-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
Convert the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t since we use it
as an atomic variable. This also allows us to remove the
rwsem_atomic_{add,update} "abstraction" which would now be an unnecesary
level of indirection. In follow up patches, we also remove the
rwsem_atomic_{add,update} definitions across the various architectures.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
---
include/linux/rwsem.h | 6 +++---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index d1c12d1..e3d5a00 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore;
#else
/* All arch specific implementations share the same struct */
struct rw_semaphore {
- long count;
+ atomic_long_t count;
struct list_head wait_list;
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
/* In all implementations count != 0 means locked */
static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- return sem->count != 0;
+ return atomic_long_read(&sem->count) != 0;
}
#endif
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
#endif
#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
- { .count = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE, \
+ { .count = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE), \
.wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list), \
.wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.wait_lock) \
__RWSEM_OPT_INIT(name) \
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 296d421..d5ecec3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem));
lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0);
#endif
- sem->count = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
+ atomic_long_set(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
@@ -146,10 +146,11 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
if (wake_type != RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED) {
adjustment = RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
try_reader_grant:
- oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem) - adjustment;
+ oldcount = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count) - adjustment;
+
if (unlikely(oldcount < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) {
/* A writer stole the lock. Undo our reader grant. */
- if (rwsem_atomic_update(-adjustment, sem) &
+ if (atomic_long_sub_return(adjustment, &sem->count) &
RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
goto out;
/* Last active locker left. Retry waking readers. */
@@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
adjustment -= RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
if (adjustment)
- rwsem_atomic_add(adjustment, sem);
+ atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
next = sem->wait_list.next;
loop = woken;
@@ -228,7 +229,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
- count = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem);
+ count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
/* If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
*
@@ -276,7 +277,8 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS :
RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS + RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
- if (cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, count) == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
+ if (atomic_long_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, count)
+ == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
rwsem_set_owner(sem);
return true;
}
@@ -290,13 +292,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- long old, count = READ_ONCE(sem->count);
+ long old, count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
while (true) {
if (!(count == 0 || count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS))
return false;
- old = cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, count,
+ old = atomic_long_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, count,
count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
if (old == count) {
rwsem_set_owner(sem);
@@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
rcu_read_lock();
owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
if (!owner) {
- long count = READ_ONCE(sem->count);
+ long count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
/*
* If sem->owner is not set, yet we have just recently entered the
* slowpath with the lock being active, then there is a possibility
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
* held by readers. Check the counter to verify the
* state.
*/
- count = READ_ONCE(sem->count);
+ count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
return (count == 0 || count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS);
}
@@ -453,7 +455,7 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem;
/* undo write bias from down_write operation, stop active locking */
- count = rwsem_atomic_update(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS, sem);
+ count = atomic_long_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS, &sem->count);
/* do optimistic spinning and steal lock if possible */
if (rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem))
@@ -476,7 +478,7 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
if (waiting) {
- count = READ_ONCE(sem->count);
+ count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
/*
* If there were already threads queued before us and there are
@@ -485,9 +487,8 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
*/
if (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READERS);
-
} else
- count = rwsem_atomic_update(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, sem);
+ count = atomic_long_add_return(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, &sem->count);
/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
set_current_state(state);
@@ -503,7 +504,7 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
schedule();
set_current_state(state);
- } while ((count = sem->count) & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK);
+ } while ((count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count)) & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 03:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rzBPY-6dy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401831 |
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> wrote:
>
> This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
> since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
patches into a single patch.
I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
it does add noise to the series.
Other than that it all looks fine to me.
Linus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 13:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t |
| Message-ID | <rzLcB-3QQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1401851 |
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:12:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> wrote:
> >
> > This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
> > since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> > the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
>
> I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
> patches into a single patch.
>
> I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
> it does add noise to the series.
>
> Other than that it all looks fine to me.
OK, done.
---
Subject: locking,rwsem: Remove rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update()
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:38:02 -0700
The rwsem-xadd count has been converted to an atomic variable and the
rwsem code now directly uses atomic_long_add() and
atomic_long_add_return(), so we can remove the arch implementations of
rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update().
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@hpe.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 42 -----------------------------------------
arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 ------
arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 37 ------------------------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 -----------------
include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 16 ---------------
5 files changed, 120 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -191,47 +191,5 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(str
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long val, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- sem->count += val;
-#else
- long temp;
- __asm__ __volatile__(
- "1: ldq_l %0,%1\n"
- " addq %0,%2,%0\n"
- " stq_c %0,%1\n"
- " beq %0,2f\n"
- ".subsection 2\n"
- "2: br 1b\n"
- ".previous"
- :"=&r" (temp), "=m" (sem->count)
- :"Ir" (val), "m" (sem->count));
-#endif
-}
-
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long val, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
- sem->count += val;
- return sem->count;
-#else
- long ret, temp;
- __asm__ __volatile__(
- "1: ldq_l %0,%1\n"
- " addq %0,%3,%2\n"
- " addq %0,%3,%0\n"
- " stq_c %2,%1\n"
- " beq %2,2f\n"
- ".subsection 2\n"
- "2: br 1b\n"
- ".previous"
- :"=&r" (ret), "=m" (sem->count), "=&r" (temp)
- :"Ir" (val), "m" (sem->count));
-
- return ret;
-#endif
-}
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ALPHA_RWSEM_H */
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -151,11 +151,4 @@ __downgrade_write (struct rw_semaphore *
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-/*
- * Implement atomic add functionality. These used to be "inline" functions, but GCC v3.1
- * doesn't quite optimize this stuff right and ends up with bad calls to fetchandadd.
- */
-#define rwsem_atomic_add(delta, sem) atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&(sem)->count))
-#define rwsem_atomic_update(delta, sem) atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&(sem)->count))
-
#endif /* _ASM_IA64_RWSEM_H */
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -207,41 +207,4 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(str
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- signed long old, new;
-
- asm volatile(
- " lg %0,%2\n"
- "0: lgr %1,%0\n"
- " agr %1,%4\n"
- " csg %0,%1,%2\n"
- " jl 0b"
- : "=&d" (old), "=&d" (new), "=Q" (sem->count)
- : "Q" (sem->count), "d" (delta)
- : "cc", "memory");
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- signed long old, new;
-
- asm volatile(
- " lg %0,%2\n"
- "0: lgr %1,%0\n"
- " agr %1,%4\n"
- " csg %0,%1,%2\n"
- " jl 0b"
- : "=&d" (old), "=&d" (new), "=Q" (sem->count)
- : "Q" (sem->count), "d" (delta)
- : "cc", "memory");
- return new;
-}
-
#endif /* _S390_RWSEM_H */
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h
@@ -215,23 +215,5 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(str
: "memory", "cc");
}
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX _ASM_ADD "%1,%0"
- : "+m" (sem->count)
- : "er" (delta));
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return delta + xadd(&sem->count, delta);
-}
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_RWSEM_H */
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -107,14 +107,6 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_
}
/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- atomic_long_add(delta, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
-}
-
-/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -134,13 +126,5 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(str
rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
}
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
- return atomic_long_add_return(delta, (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count);
-}
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_RWSEM_H */
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t |
| Message-ID | <rzQFj-7kq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1402292 |
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 13:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:12:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
> > > since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> > > the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
> >
> > I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
> > patches into a single patch.
> >
> > I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
> > it does add noise to the series.
> >
> > Other than that it all looks fine to me.
>
> OK, done.
Right, they all fit under the same category of "Removing
rwsem_atomic_{add,update}", so it makes sense to fold them into one
patch.
Thanks,
Jason
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t |
| Message-ID | <rAM6B-1Zw-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1402292 |
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >Subject: locking,rwsem: Remove rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update() >From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> >Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:38:02 -0700 > >The rwsem-xadd count has been converted to an atomic variable and the >rwsem code now directly uses atomic_long_add() and >atomic_long_add_return(), so we can remove the arch implementations of >rwsem_atomic_add() and rwsem_atomic_update(). > >Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> >Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> >Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> >Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> >Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> >Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> >Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> >Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> >Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> >Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> >Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >Cc: Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@hpe.com> >Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> >Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> >Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> >Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> >Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> >Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> >Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> >--- > arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 42 ----------------------------------------- > arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 7 ------ > arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 37 ------------------------------------ > arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ----------------- > include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 16 --------------- > 5 files changed, 120 deletions(-) Nice. This, along with Michal's work getting rid of a lot of superfluous implementations, have gotten rid of plenty of rwsem code in arch/* Thanks, Davidlohr
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web