Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1402478
| From | Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t |
| Date | 2016-05-17 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rzQFj-7kq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rzBmV-5OI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzBPY-6dy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzLcB-3QQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 13:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:12:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an atomic_long_t
> > > since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> > > the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
> >
> > I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
> > patches into a single patch.
> >
> > I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
> > it does add noise to the series.
> >
> > Other than that it all looks fine to me.
>
> OK, done.
Right, they all fit under the same category of "Removing
rwsem_atomic_{add,update}", so it makes sense to fold them into one
patch.
Thanks,
Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 6/7] locking,s390: Remove s390 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 7/7] locking,asm-generic: Remove generic rwsem add and rwsem update definitions Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 5/7] locking,ia64: Remove ia64 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 1/7] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock by reducing operations in slowpath Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 3/7] locking,x86: Remove x86 rwsem add and rwsem update Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 2/7] locking/rwsem: Convert sem->count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 02:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-17 03:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-17 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-17 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to atomic_long_t Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-05-20 08:30 +0200
csiph-web