Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1390323 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v0 3/3] perf, x86: Bypass PT vs LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

Started byAlexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
First post2016-04-28 17:40 +0200
Last post2016-05-05 11:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v0 3/3] perf, x86: Bypass PT vs LBR exclusivity if the core supports it Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-28 17:40 +0200
    [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if  the core supports it tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-05-05 11:50 +0200

#1390323 — [PATCH v0 3/3] perf, x86: Bypass PT vs LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

FromAlexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-28 17:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v0 3/3] perf, x86: Bypass PT vs LBR exclusivity if the core supports it
Message-ID<rsWcO-5NB-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Not all cores prevent using Intel PT and LBRs simultaneously, although
most of them still do as of today. This patch adds an opt-in flag for
such cores to disable mutual exclusivity between PT and LBR; also flip
it on for Goldmont.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 6 ++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 1 +
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 41d93d0e97..5e5e76a52f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) {
 		mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive); i++) {
@@ -380,6 +383,9 @@ fail_unlock:
 
 void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return;
+
 	atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]);
 	atomic_dec(&active_events);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 79b59437f5..e36422c687 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3609,6 +3609,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		 */
 		x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = NULL;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
+		x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist = true;
 		x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
 		pr_cont("Goldmont events, ");
 		break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 7d62a02f49..8bd764df81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	u64		lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
 	const int	*lbr_sel_map;		   /* lbr_select mappings */
 	bool		lbr_double_abort;	   /* duplicated lbr aborts */
+	bool		lbr_pt_coexist;		   /* LBR may coexist with PT */
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1394987 — [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

Fromtip-bot for Alexander Shishkin <tipbot@zytor.com>
Date2016-05-05 11:50 +0200
Subject[tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it
Message-ID<rvo4W-5Xt-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1390323
Commit-ID:  ccbebba4c6bfda8e3ef9e431ce2c3d91c5fc5a63
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/ccbebba4c6bfda8e3ef9e431ce2c3d91c5fc5a63
Author:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:35:46 +0300
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:16:28 +0200

perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

Not all cores prevent using Intel PT and LBRs simultaneously, although
most of them still do as of today. This patch adds an opt-in flag for
such cores to disable mutual exclusivity between PT and LBR; also flip
it on for Goldmont.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: vince@deater.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461857746-31346-4-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 6 ++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 1 +
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 41d93d0..5e5e76a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) {
 		mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive); i++) {
@@ -380,6 +383,9 @@ fail_unlock:
 
 void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return;
+
 	atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]);
 	atomic_dec(&active_events);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 90ba3ae..cd31940 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3609,6 +3609,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		 */
 		x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = NULL;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
+		x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist = true;
 		x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
 		pr_cont("Goldmont events, ");
 		break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 7d62a02..8bd764d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	u64		lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
 	const int	*lbr_sel_map;		   /* lbr_select mappings */
 	bool		lbr_double_abort;	   /* duplicated lbr aborts */
+	bool		lbr_pt_coexist;		   /* LBR may coexist with PT */
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web