Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1394987

[tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

From tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin <tipbot@zytor.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it
Date 2016-05-05 11:50 +0200
Message-ID <rvo4W-5Xt-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rsWcO-5NB-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Commit-ID:  ccbebba4c6bfda8e3ef9e431ce2c3d91c5fc5a63
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/ccbebba4c6bfda8e3ef9e431ce2c3d91c5fc5a63
Author:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:35:46 +0300
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:16:28 +0200

perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it

Not all cores prevent using Intel PT and LBRs simultaneously, although
most of them still do as of today. This patch adds an opt-in flag for
such cores to disable mutual exclusivity between PT and LBR; also flip
it on for Goldmont.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: vince@deater.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461857746-31346-4-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 6 ++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 1 +
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 41d93d0..5e5e76a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) {
 		mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive); i++) {
@@ -380,6 +383,9 @@ fail_unlock:
 
 void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+		return;
+
 	atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]);
 	atomic_dec(&active_events);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 90ba3ae..cd31940 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3609,6 +3609,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		 */
 		x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = NULL;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
+		x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist = true;
 		x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
 		pr_cont("Goldmont events, ");
 		break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 7d62a02..8bd764d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	u64		lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
 	const int	*lbr_sel_map;		   /* lbr_select mappings */
 	bool		lbr_double_abort;	   /* duplicated lbr aborts */
+	bool		lbr_pt_coexist;		   /* LBR may coexist with PT */
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v0 3/3] perf, x86: Bypass PT vs LBR exclusivity if the core supports it Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-28 17:40 +0200
  [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if  the core supports it tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-05-05 11:50 +0200

csiph-web