Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1386881 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset

Started bySudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
First post2016-04-25 22:50 +0200
Last post2016-04-26 10:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 22:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-04-25 23:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-26 10:40 +0200

#1386881 — [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-25 22:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
Message-ID<rrVCa-3B8-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index 5bc530c..aca4505 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
 	if (IS_ERR(chip))
 		return chip;
 
-	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
-	if (rc) {
-		put_device(&chip->dev);
+	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
+				      &chip->dev);
+	if (rc)
 		return ERR_PTR(rc);
-	}
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
 
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1386887

FromJason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Date2016-04-25 23:00 +0200
Message-ID<rrVLR-3EY-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1386881
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1387230

FromJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-26 10:40 +0200
Message-ID<rs6Hg-4gv-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1386881
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?

/Jarkko

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 5bc530c..aca4505 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>  	if (IS_ERR(chip))
>  		return chip;
>  
> -	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		put_device(&chip->dev);
> +	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
> +				      &chip->dev);
> +	if (rc)
>  		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> -	}
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web