Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1380581 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-16 20:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-20 06:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-04-16 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-04-20 06:30 +0200
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock() |
| Message-ID | <roCFJ-7pv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics,
therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
lib/irq_poll.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/irq_poll.c b/lib/irq_poll.c
index 836f7db4e548..2a6ae2720ccb 100644
--- a/lib/irq_poll.c
+++ b/lib/irq_poll.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_poll_sched);
static void __irq_poll_complete(struct irq_poll *iop)
{
list_del(&iop->list);
- smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit_unlock(IRQ_POLL_F_SCHED, &iop->state);
}
@@ -161,7 +160,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_poll_disable);
void irq_poll_enable(struct irq_poll *iop)
{
BUG_ON(!test_bit(IRQ_POLL_F_SCHED, &iop->state));
- smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit_unlock(IRQ_POLL_F_SCHED, &iop->state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_poll_enable);
--
2.8.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 06:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] irq_poll: Remove redundant barrier when using clear_bit_unlock() |
| Message-ID | <rpRW2-1U8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1380581 |
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bart Van Assche wrote: >On 04/16/2016 01:55 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >>... as the call obviously already implies unlock/RC semantics, >>therefore lets get rid of the superfluous smp_mb calls. > >Hello Davidlohr, > >Are you sure that this patch has been sent to the right person? I have >helped to review a change in this code but I'm not the maintainer of >this code. Ah, adding Andrew and Ingo, not sure who is responsible for these bits. Thanks, Davidlohr
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web