Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1376702 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-12 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-12 16:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period() Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-12 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 16:30 +0200
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period() |
| Message-ID | <rn4mJ-6uB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless > call to pwm_set_period(), which might mess up with the internal PWM state. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Thierry
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rn7kC-eE-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1376702 |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless > > call to pwm_set_period(), which might mess up with the internal PWM state. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Applied, thanks. Applied? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rn7ui-ky-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1376847 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless > > > call to pwm_set_period(), which might mess up with the internal PWM state. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 +--- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > Applied? You Acked it, so I assumed you were fine with me taking it through the PWM tree to take care of the dependencies. Did I assume wrongly? Thierry
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web