Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period()

From	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period()
Date	2016-04-12 16:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rn7ui-ky-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<riuBc-28V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <riuBc-28V-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn4mJ-6uB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn7kC-eE-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless
> > > call to pwm_set_period(), which might mess up with the internal PWM state.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 +---
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Applied?

You Acked it, so I assumed you were fine with me taking it through the
PWM tree to take care of the dependencies.

Did I assume wrongly?

Thierry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to  pwm_set_period() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 13:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to  pwm_set_period() Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-12 16:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 02/46] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to  pwm_set_period() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 16:30 +0200

csiph-web