Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1376405 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: modify document of Rockchip power domains

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: modify document of Rockchip power domains Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-04-12 04:10 +0200

#1376405 — Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: modify document of Rockchip power domains

Hi Kevin,

Am Freitag, 18. März 2016, 23:16:55 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> Am Freitag, 18. März 2016, 09:18:51 schrieb Kevin Hilman:
> > Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> writes:
> > > Add qos example for power domain which found on Rockchip SoCs.
> > > These qos register description in TRMs
> > > (rk3036, rk3228, rk3288, rk3366, rk3368, rk3399) looks the same.
> > 
> > This should describe in more detail what "qos" is in this context.  At
> > first glance, it's just a range of registers that lose context that need
> > to be saved/restored.
> 
> I guess that should be something like
> 
> ---- 8< ----
> Rockchip SoCs contain quality of service (qos) blocks managing priority,
> bandwidth, etc of the connection of each domain to the interconnect.
> These blocks loose state when their domain gets disabled and therefore
> need to be saved when disabling and restored when enabling a power-domain.
> 
> These qos blocks also are similar over all currently available Rockchip
> SoCs.
> ---- 8< ----

does this look sane to you in terms of description, or do we need something 
more?


Heiko

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web