Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1376405
| From | Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: modify document of Rockchip power domains |
| Date | 2016-04-12 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmVWa-7KC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rdWRr-2n2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <re5i3-1rG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <reaUp-1RE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Kevin, Am Freitag, 18. März 2016, 23:16:55 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Freitag, 18. März 2016, 09:18:51 schrieb Kevin Hilman: > > Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> writes: > > > Add qos example for power domain which found on Rockchip SoCs. > > > These qos register description in TRMs > > > (rk3036, rk3228, rk3288, rk3366, rk3368, rk3399) looks the same. > > > > This should describe in more detail what "qos" is in this context. At > > first glance, it's just a range of registers that lose context that need > > to be saved/restored. > > I guess that should be something like > > ---- 8< ---- > Rockchip SoCs contain quality of service (qos) blocks managing priority, > bandwidth, etc of the connection of each domain to the interconnect. > These blocks loose state when their domain gets disabled and therefore > need to be saved when disabling and restored when enabling a power-domain. > > These qos blocks also are similar over all currently available Rockchip > SoCs. > ---- 8< ---- does this look sane to you in terms of description, or do we need something more? Heiko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: modify document of Rockchip power domains Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-04-12 04:10 +0200
csiph-web