Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1374109 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 11:50 +0200

#1374109 — Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> wrote:

> +static int stm32_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(chip->parent);
> +       struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int irq;
> +
> +       regmap_field_write(pctl->irqmux[offset], bank->range.id);

No. You must implement the irqchip and GPIO controllers to
be orthogonal, doing things like this creates a semantic that
assumes .to_irq() is always called before using the IRQ and
that is not guaranteed at all. A consumer may very well
use an interrupt right off the irqchip without this being called
first. All this function should do is translate a number. No
other semantics.

This needs to be done from the irqchip (sorry).

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web