Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1374109

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios

From Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios
Date 2016-04-08 11:50 +0200
Message-ID <rlBd8-1LF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <riMoq-6WJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <riMy7-71p-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> wrote:

> +static int stm32_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(chip->parent);
> +       struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       unsigned int irq;
> +
> +       regmap_field_write(pctl->irqmux[offset], bank->range.id);

No. You must implement the irqchip and GPIO controllers to
be orthogonal, doing things like this creates a semantic that
assumes .to_irq() is always called before using the IRQ and
that is not guaranteed at all. A consumer may very well
use an interrupt right off the irqchip without this being called
first. All this function should do is translate a number. No
other semantics.

This needs to be done from the irqchip (sorry).

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 11:50 +0200

csiph-web