Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1370616 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support

Started byMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
First post2016-04-04 15:40 +0200
Last post2016-04-05 09:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-04 15:40 +0200
    RE: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support "Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@intel.com> - 2016-04-04 16:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-05 09:50 +0200

#1370616 — Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support

FromMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-04 15:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support
Message-ID<rkcTv-3Fi-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:44:44PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> Add ACPI support for pin controller properties. These are
> based on ACPI _DSD properties and follow the device tree
> model based on states and node configurations. The states
> are defined as _DSD properties and configuration nodes
> are defined using the _DSD Hierarchical Properties Extension.
> 
> A configuration node supports the generic device tree properties.
> 
> The implementation is based on device tree code from devicetree.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>

Looks good to me. Few minor comments below, though.

> ---
>  Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt | 274 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                  |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c                    | 322 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/acpi.h                    |  32 +++
>  drivers/pinctrl/core.c                    |  26 +++
>  drivers/pinctrl/core.h                    |   2 +
>  6 files changed, 657 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/acpi.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt b/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e93aaaf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
> += _DSD Device Properties related to pin controllers =
> +
> +== Introduction ==
> +
> +This document is an extension of the pin control subsystem in Linux [1]
> +and provides a way to describe pin controller properties in ACPI. It is
> +based on the Device Specific Data (_DSD) configuration object [2] that
> +was introduced in ACPI 5.1.
> +
> +Pin controllers are hardware modules that control pins by allowing pin
> +multiplexing and configuration. Pin multiplexing allows using the same
> +physical pins for multiple functions; for example, one pin or group of pins
> +may be used for the I2C bus, SPI bus or as general-purpose GPIO pin. Pin
> +configuration allows setting various properties such as pull-up/down,
> +tri-state, drive-strength, etc.
> +
> +Hardware modules whose signals are affected by pin configuration are
> +designated client devices. For a client device to operate correctly,
> +certain pin controllers must set up certain specific pin configurations.
> +Some client devices need a single static pin configuration, e.g. set up
> +during initialization. Others need to reconfigure pins at run-time,
> +for example to tri-state pins when the device is inactive. Hence, each
> +client device can define a set of named states. Each named state is
> +mapped to a pin controller configuration that describes the pin multiplexing
> +or configuration for that state.
> +
> +In ACPI, each pin controller and each client device is represented as an
> +ACPI device, just like any other hardware module. The pin controller
> +properties are defined using _DSD properties [2] under these devices.
> +The named states are defined using Device Properties UUID [3] under the
> +ACPI client device. The configuration nodes are defined using Hierarchical
> +Properties Extension UUID [4] and are split between the ACPI client device
> +and the pin controller device. The configuration nodes contain properties
> +that describe pin multiplexing or configuration that very similar to the
> +ones used for device tree [5].
> +
> +== Example ==
> +
> +For example, let's consider an accelerometer connected to the I2C bus on
> +a platform with a Baytrail pin controller. The accelerometer uses 2 GPIO
> +pins for I2C (SDA, SCL) and one GPIO pin for interrupt.
> +
> +The name for the pins, groups and functions used are the ones defined in the
> +pin controller driver, in the same way as it is done for device tree [5].
> +
> +For the I2C pins, the pin controller driver defines one group called
> +"i2c5_grp" that can be multiplexed with functions "i2c" or "gpio".
> +In our case, we need to select function "i2c" for group "i2c5_grp" in
> +the ACPI description.
> +
> +For the GPIO pin, the pin controller driver defines the name "GPIO_S5[00]"

BTW, those pin names were changed for Baytrail pinctrl driver so you
should probably do that here also.

> +for the pin with index 0 that we use. We need to configure this pin to
> +pull-down with pull strength of 10000 Ohms. We might also want to disable
> +the bias for the GPIO interrupt pin when entering sleep.
> +
> +Here is an ASL example for this device:
> +
> +  // Pin controller device
> +  Scope (_SB.GPO0)
> +  {
> +      Name (MUX0, Package()
> +      {
> +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {"function", "i2c"},
> +              Package (2) {"groups", Package () {"i2c5_grp"}},
> +          }
> +      })
> +
> +      Name (CFG0, Package()
> +      {
> +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {"GPIO_S5[00]"}},
> +              Package (2) {"bias-pull-down", 10000},
> +          }
> +      })
> +
> +      Name (CFG1, Package()
> +      {
> +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {"GPIO_S5[00]"}},
> +              Package (2) {"bias-disable", 0},
> +          }
> +      })
> +  }
> +
> +  // Accelerometer device with default pinmux and pinconfig for i2c and
> +  // GPIO pins
> +  Scope (_SB.I2C0)
> +  {
> +      Device (ACL0)
> +      {
> +          Name (_HID, ...)
> +
> +          Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized)
> +          {
> +              Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> +              {
> +                  I2cSerialBus (...)
> +                  GpioInt (Edge, ActiveHigh, Exclusive, PullDown, 0x0000,
> +                           "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, , ) { 0 }
> +              })
> +              Return (RBUF)
> +          }
> +
> +          Name (_DSD, Package ()
> +          {
> +              ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +              Package ()
> +              {
> +                  Package () {"pinctrl-names", Package() {"default", "sleep"}},
> +                  Package ()
> +                  {
> +                      "pinctrl-0",
> +                      Package()
> +                      {
> +                          "accel-default-mux-i2c",
> +                          "accel-default-cfg-int",
> +                      }
> +                  },
> +                  Package ()
> +                  {
> +                      "pinctrl-1",
> +                      Package()
> +                      {
> +                          "accel-sleep-cfg-int",
> +                      }
> +                  },
> +
> +              },
> +              ToUUID("dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b"),
> +              Package ()
> +              {
> +                  Package (2) {"accel-default-mux-i2c", "\\_SB.GPO0.MUX0"},
> +                  Package (2) {"accel-default-cfg-int", "\\_SB.GPO0.CFG0"},
> +                  Package (2) {"accel-sleep-cfg-int", "\\_SB.GPO0.CFG1"},
> +              },
> +          })
> +      }
> +  }
> +
> +In the ASL excerpt, the accelerometer device has 2 states:
> +  - a default state with 2 pin configurations:
> +    - a pin multiplexing node for the i2c pins that sets function "i2c"
> +      for the "i2c5_grp" pin group
> +    - a pin configuration node for the GPIO interrupt pin that pull down
> +      the "GPIO_S5[00]" pin and sets a pull strength of 10000 Ohms
> +  - a sleep state with 1 pin configuration:
> +    - a pin configuration node for pin "GPIO_S5[00]" that disables pin
> +    bias
> +
> +== _DSD pinctrl properties format ==
> +
> +=== Pin controller client device states  ===
> +
> +The pinctrl states are defined under the device node they apply to.
> +The format of the pinctrl states is:
> +
> +  Name (_DSD, Package ()
> +  {
> +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +      Package ()
> +      {
> +          Package () {"pinctrl-names", Package() {statename0, statename1, ...}},
> +          Package () {"pinctrl-0", Package() {cfgname0, cfgname1, ...}},
> +          Package () {"pinctrl-1", Package() {cfgname2, cfgname3, ...}},
> +      }
> +  }
> +
> +  statename - name of the pinctrl device state (e.g.: default, sleep, etc.).
> +              These names are associated with the lists of configurations
> +	      defined below: statename0 defines the name for configuration
> +	      property "pinctrl-0", statename1 defines the name for
> +	      configuration property "pinctrl-1", etc.
> +  cfgname - name for the configuration data-only subnode.
> +
> +=== Pin controller configuration nodes  ===
> +
> +The configuration data-only subnodes are defined using the Hierarchical
> +Properties Extension UUID [4]. Their definition is split between the device
> +node and the pin controller node. The format for these subnodes is:
> +
> +  Scope (DEV0)
> +  {
> +      Name (_DSD, Package ()
> +      {
> +          ToUUID("dbb8e3e6-5886-4ba6-8795-1319f52a966b"),
> +          Package ()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {cfgname0, "\\GPO0.DNP0"},
> +              Package (2) {cfgname1, "\\GPO0.DNP1"},
> +          },
> +      })
> +  }
> +
> +  Scope (GPO0)
> +  {
> +      Name (DPN0, Package()

Maybe we should use node names that relate to the pinctrl subsystem and
not the ones used in the hierarchical properties extension example? I mean
real examples.

> +      {
> +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package() {...}
> +      })
> +      Name (DPN1, Package()
> +      {
> +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package() {...}
> +      })
> +  }
> +
> +Each DPN data subnode is a regular _DSD node that uses Device Properties
> +UUID [3]. There are 2 types of subnodes, depending on the properties it
> +contains: pin multiplexing nodes and pin configuration nodes.
> +
> +==== Pin multiplexing nodes  ====
> +
> +The pin multiplexing nodes must contain a property named "function" and
> +define a mux function to be applied to a list of pin groups. The properties
> +supported by this node are the same as for device tree [5]. The name for the
> +pins, groups and functions used are the ones defined in the pin controller
> +driver, in the same way as it is done for device tree [5]. The format for
> +this data subnode is:
> +
> +  Name (DPN0, Package()

Same here.

> +  {
> +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {"function", functioname},
> +              Package (2) {"groups", Package () {groupname1, groupname2, ...}},
> +          }
> +  })
> +
> +  functioname - the pinmux function to select.
> +  groups - the list of groups to select with this function
> +
> +==== Pin configuration nodes  ====
> +
> +The pin configuration nodes do not contain a property named "function".
> +They must contain a property named "group" or "pins". They will also
> +contain one or more configuration properties like bias-pull-up,
> +drive-open-drain, etc. The properties supported by this node are the
> +same as for device tree. Standard pinctrl properties are defined in the
> +device tree documentation [5] and in <include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>.
> +Pinctrl drivers may also define their own custom properties. The name for the
> +pins/groups  used are the ones defined in the pin controller driver, in the
> +same way as it is done for device tree [5]. The format for the data subnode is:
> +
> +  Name (DPN0, Package()

And here.

> +  {
> +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> +          Package()
> +          {
> +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {pin1, pin2, ...}},
> +              Package (2) {configname1, configval1},

These should be enclosed in quotes, like "configname1" and so on.

> +              Package (2) {configname2, configval2},
> +          }
> +  })
> +
> +  pins - list of pins that properties in the node apply to
> +  configname - name of the pin configuration property
> +  configval - value of the pin configuration property
> +
> +== References ==
> +
> +[1] Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> +[2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel-1_1.htm
> +[3] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdf
> +[4] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf
> +[5] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> index e4bc115..12d3af6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-y				+= core.o pinctrl-utils.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINMUX)		+= pinmux.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCONF)		+= pinconf.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF)		+= devicetree.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PINCONF)	+= pinconf-generic.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ADI2)	+= pinctrl-adi2.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_AS3722)	+= pinctrl-as3722.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bed1d88
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
> +/*
> + * ACPI integration for the pin control subsystem
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2016, Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * Derived from:
> + *  devicetree.c - Copyright (C) 2012 NVIDIA CORPORATION
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
> +
> +#include "acpi.h"
> +#include "core.h"
> +#include "pinconf.h"
> +#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * struct pinctrl_acpi_map - mapping table chunk parsed from ACPI
> + * @node: list node for struct pinctrl's @fw_maps field
> + * @pctldev: the pin controller that allocated this struct, and will free it
> + * @maps: the mapping table entries
> + */
> +struct pinctrl_acpi_map {
> +	struct list_head node;
> +	struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
> +	struct pinctrl_map *map;
> +	unsigned num_maps;
> +};
> +
> +static void acpi_maps_list_dh(acpi_handle handle, void *data)
> +{
> +	/* The address of this function is used as a key. */
> +}
> +
> +static struct list_head *acpi_get_maps(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +	struct list_head *maps;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh, (void **)&maps);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return maps;
> +}
> +
> +static void acpi_free_maps(struct device *dev, struct list_head *maps)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +
> +	acpi_detach_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh);
> +	kfree(maps);
> +}
> +
> +static int acpi_init_maps(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +	struct list_head *maps;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	maps = kzalloc(sizeof(*maps), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!maps)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(maps);
> +
> +	status = acpi_attach_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh, maps);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))

This leaks maps.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1370643

From"Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
Date2016-04-04 16:10 +0200
Message-ID<rkdmy-47v-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1370616

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: 04 April, 2016 16:37
> To: Tirdea, Irina
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Len Brown; Linus Walleij; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Rob Herring; Heikki Krogerus;
> Andy Shevchenko; Purdila, Octavian; Ciocan, Cristina; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add ACPI support
> 
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:44:44PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> > Add ACPI support for pin controller properties. These are
> > based on ACPI _DSD properties and follow the device tree
> > model based on states and node configurations. The states
> > are defined as _DSD properties and configuration nodes
> > are defined using the _DSD Hierarchical Properties Extension.
> >
> > A configuration node supports the generic device tree properties.
> >
> > The implementation is based on device tree code from devicetree.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
> 
> Looks good to me. Few minor comments below, though.

Thanks for the review, Mika!

> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt | 274 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                  |   1 +
> >  drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c                    | 322 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/acpi.h                    |  32 +++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/core.c                    |  26 +++
> >  drivers/pinctrl/core.h                    |   2 +
> >  6 files changed, 657 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/acpi.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt b/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e93aaaf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/acpi/pinctrl-properties.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
> > += _DSD Device Properties related to pin controllers =
> > +
> > +== Introduction ==
> > +
> > +This document is an extension of the pin control subsystem in Linux [1]
> > +and provides a way to describe pin controller properties in ACPI. It is
> > +based on the Device Specific Data (_DSD) configuration object [2] that
> > +was introduced in ACPI 5.1.
> > +
> > +Pin controllers are hardware modules that control pins by allowing pin
> > +multiplexing and configuration. Pin multiplexing allows using the same
> > +physical pins for multiple functions; for example, one pin or group of pins
> > +may be used for the I2C bus, SPI bus or as general-purpose GPIO pin. Pin
> > +configuration allows setting various properties such as pull-up/down,
> > +tri-state, drive-strength, etc.
> > +
> > +Hardware modules whose signals are affected by pin configuration are
> > +designated client devices. For a client device to operate correctly,
> > +certain pin controllers must set up certain specific pin configurations.
> > +Some client devices need a single static pin configuration, e.g. set up
> > +during initialization. Others need to reconfigure pins at run-time,
> > +for example to tri-state pins when the device is inactive. Hence, each
> > +client device can define a set of named states. Each named state is
> > +mapped to a pin controller configuration that describes the pin multiplexing
> > +or configuration for that state.
> > +
> > +In ACPI, each pin controller and each client device is represented as an
> > +ACPI device, just like any other hardware module. The pin controller
> > +properties are defined using _DSD properties [2] under these devices.
> > +The named states are defined using Device Properties UUID [3] under the
> > +ACPI client device. The configuration nodes are defined using Hierarchical
> > +Properties Extension UUID [4] and are split between the ACPI client device
> > +and the pin controller device. The configuration nodes contain properties
> > +that describe pin multiplexing or configuration that very similar to the
> > +ones used for device tree [5].
> > +
> > +== Example ==
> > +
> > +For example, let's consider an accelerometer connected to the I2C bus on
> > +a platform with a Baytrail pin controller. The accelerometer uses 2 GPIO
> > +pins for I2C (SDA, SCL) and one GPIO pin for interrupt.
> > +
> > +The name for the pins, groups and functions used are the ones defined in the
> > +pin controller driver, in the same way as it is done for device tree [5].
> > +
> > +For the I2C pins, the pin controller driver defines one group called
> > +"i2c5_grp" that can be multiplexed with functions "i2c" or "gpio".
> > +In our case, we need to select function "i2c" for group "i2c5_grp" in
> > +the ACPI description.
> > +
> > +For the GPIO pin, the pin controller driver defines the name "GPIO_S5[00]"
> 
> BTW, those pin names were changed for Baytrail pinctrl driver so you
> should probably do that here also.
> 
Right, will update it according to the current naming.
> > +for the pin with index 0 that we use. We need to configure this pin to
> > +pull-down with pull strength of 10000 Ohms. We might also want to disable
> > +the bias for the GPIO interrupt pin when entering sleep.
> > +
> > +Here is an ASL example for this device:
> > +
> > +  // Pin controller device
> > +  Scope (_SB.GPO0)
> > +  {
> > +      Name (MUX0, Package()
> > +      {
> > +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package()
> > +          {
> > +              Package (2) {"function", "i2c"},
> > +              Package (2) {"groups", Package () {"i2c5_grp"}},
> > +          }
> > +      })
> > +
> > +      Name (CFG0, Package()
> > +      {
> > +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package()
> > +          {
> > +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {"GPIO_S5[00]"}},
> > +              Package (2) {"bias-pull-down", 10000},
> > +          }
> > +      })
> > +
> > +      Name (CFG1, Package()
> > +      {
> > +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package()
> > +          {
> > +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {"GPIO_S5[00]"}},
> > +              Package (2) {"bias-disable", 0},
> > +          }
> > +      })
> > +  }
> > +
> > +
<snip>
> > +  Scope (GPO0)
> > +  {
> > +      Name (DPN0, Package()
> 
> Maybe we should use node names that relate to the pinctrl subsystem and
> not the ones used in the hierarchical properties extension example? I mean
> real examples.
> 
OK, I will use MUX0 and CFG0 instead.
> > +      {
> > +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package() {...}
> > +      })
> > +      Name (DPN1, Package()
> > +      {
> > +          ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package() {...}
> > +      })
> > +  }
> > +
> > +Each DPN data subnode is a regular _DSD node that uses Device Properties
> > +UUID [3]. There are 2 types of subnodes, depending on the properties it
> > +contains: pin multiplexing nodes and pin configuration nodes.
> > +
> > +==== Pin multiplexing nodes  ====
> > +
> > +The pin multiplexing nodes must contain a property named "function" and
> > +define a mux function to be applied to a list of pin groups. The properties
> > +supported by this node are the same as for device tree [5]. The name for the
> > +pins, groups and functions used are the ones defined in the pin controller
> > +driver, in the same way as it is done for device tree [5]. The format for
> > +this data subnode is:
> > +
> > +  Name (DPN0, Package()
> 
> Same here.
> 
> > +  {
> > +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package()
> > +          {
> > +              Package (2) {"function", functioname},
> > +              Package (2) {"groups", Package () {groupname1, groupname2, ...}},
> > +          }
> > +  })
> > +
> > +  functioname - the pinmux function to select.
> > +  groups - the list of groups to select with this function
> > +
> > +==== Pin configuration nodes  ====
> > +
> > +The pin configuration nodes do not contain a property named "function".
> > +They must contain a property named "group" or "pins". They will also
> > +contain one or more configuration properties like bias-pull-up,
> > +drive-open-drain, etc. The properties supported by this node are the
> > +same as for device tree. Standard pinctrl properties are defined in the
> > +device tree documentation [5] and in <include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>.
> > +Pinctrl drivers may also define their own custom properties. The name for the
> > +pins/groups  used are the ones defined in the pin controller driver, in the
> > +same way as it is done for device tree [5]. The format for the data subnode is:
> > +
> > +  Name (DPN0, Package()
> 
> And here.
> 
> > +  {
> > +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > +          Package()
> > +          {
> > +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {pin1, pin2, ...}},
> > +              Package (2) {configname1, configval1},
> 
> These should be enclosed in quotes, like "configname1" and so on.
> 
OK. Should all string properties be enclosed in quotes or only the property names
(e.g. should I also change values like "configval1", "pin1", "statename1", etc.)?
> > +              Package (2) {configname2, configval2},
> > +          }
> > +  })
> > +
> > +  pins - list of pins that properties in the node apply to
> > +  configname - name of the pin configuration property
> > +  configval - value of the pin configuration property
> > +
> > +== References ==
> > +
> > +[1] Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> > +[2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel-1_1.htm
> > +[3] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdf
> > +[4] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf
> > +[5] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> > index e4bc115..12d3af6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-y				+= core.o pinctrl-utils.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINMUX)		+= pinmux.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCONF)		+= pinconf.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_OF)		+= devicetree.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PINCONF)	+= pinconf-generic.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ADI2)	+= pinctrl-adi2.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_AS3722)	+= pinctrl-as3722.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..bed1d88
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/acpi.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
> > +/*
> > + * ACPI integration for the pin control subsystem
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2016, Intel Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * Derived from:
> > + *  devicetree.c - Copyright (C) 2012 NVIDIA CORPORATION
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> > + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> > + * more details.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> > +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
> > +
> > +#include "acpi.h"
> > +#include "core.h"
> > +#include "pinconf.h"
> > +#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct pinctrl_acpi_map - mapping table chunk parsed from ACPI
> > + * @node: list node for struct pinctrl's @fw_maps field
> > + * @pctldev: the pin controller that allocated this struct, and will free it
> > + * @maps: the mapping table entries
> > + */
> > +struct pinctrl_acpi_map {
> > +	struct list_head node;
> > +	struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
> > +	struct pinctrl_map *map;
> > +	unsigned num_maps;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void acpi_maps_list_dh(acpi_handle handle, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	/* The address of this function is used as a key. */
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct list_head *acpi_get_maps(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> > +	struct list_head *maps;
> > +	acpi_status status;
> > +
> > +	status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh, (void **)&maps);
> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	return maps;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void acpi_free_maps(struct device *dev, struct list_head *maps)
> > +{
> > +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> > +
> > +	acpi_detach_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh);
> > +	kfree(maps);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int acpi_init_maps(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> > +	struct list_head *maps;
> > +	acpi_status status;
> > +
> > +	maps = kzalloc(sizeof(*maps), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!maps)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(maps);
> > +
> > +	status = acpi_attach_data(handle, acpi_maps_list_dh, maps);
> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> 
> This leaks maps.
Oops. I'll fix this.
> 
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1371288

FromMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-05 09:50 +0200
Message-ID<rktUm-8dF-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1370643
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 02:01:13PM +0000, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
> > > +  {
> > > +      ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> > > +          Package()
> > > +          {
> > > +              Package (2) {"pins", Package () {pin1, pin2, ...}},
> > > +              Package (2) {configname1, configval1},
> > 
> > These should be enclosed in quotes, like "configname1" and so on.
> > 
> OK. Should all string properties be enclosed in quotes or only the property names
> (e.g. should I also change values like "configval1", "pin1", "statename1", etc.)?

I think all types should be documented using correct format. Strings
should have "" and so on.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web