Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371694 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-05 17:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-05 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: Only log stall errors when attaching Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> - 2016-04-05 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: Only log stall errors when attaching Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-04-05 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: Only log stall errors when attaching Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-04-05 19:20 +0200
| From | Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 17:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: Only log stall errors when attaching |
| Message-ID | <rkACu-5ln-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Move the logging of timeouts when stalling the MMU to > rk_iommu_attach_device, as it's expected that sometimes the MMU won't > get stalled when detaching a device, and it's not a real problem that > would need to be communicated to the user. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Heiko, any opinion on this patch?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkCkW-70h-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1371694 |
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016, 16:57:26 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > Move the logging of timeouts when stalling the MMU to > > rk_iommu_attach_device, as it's expected that sometimes the MMU won't > > get stalled when detaching a device, and it's not a real problem that > > would need to be communicated to the user. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > > Heiko, any opinion on this patch? I don't know enough about iommus (and the rockchip implementation) to judge if this is correct. The reasoning sound right though and it seems to fix an issue for Tomeu. One complaint would be that I'd expect the behaviour to match between the enable and disable functions. Meaning I'd want the error message from rk_iommu_disable_stall to also move rk_iommu_attach_device. Heiko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkCNY-7ui-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1371779 |
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016, 09:48:15 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016, 16:57:26 schrieb Joerg Roedel: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > > Move the logging of timeouts when stalling the MMU to > > > rk_iommu_attach_device, as it's expected that sometimes the MMU won't > > > get stalled when detaching a device, and it's not a real problem that > > > would need to be communicated to the user. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > > > > Heiko, any opinion on this patch? > > I don't know enough about iommus (and the rockchip implementation) to > judge if this is correct. The reasoning sound right though and it seems > to fix an issue for Tomeu. > > One complaint would be that I'd expect the behaviour to match between the > enable and disable functions. Meaning I'd want the error message from > rk_iommu_disable_stall to also move rk_iommu_attach_device. hmm, or does John's patch maybe tie into this problem? Aka, does the iommu simply does not detect when it's already stalled and emits the timeout then? Tomeu, in which cases do you see the excess error message?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web