Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1451018 > unrolled thread

[RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct

Started bySalah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
First post2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
Last post2016-07-27 17:30 +0200
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
    [RESEND PATCH 3/4] fs: befs: Remove useless calls to brelse in befs_find_brun_dblindirect Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
    [RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
      Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-07-27 17:40 +0200
    Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from  befs_find_brun_direct Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-07-27 17:30 +0200

#1451018 — [RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct

FromSalah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
Subject[RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct
Message-ID<rZny1-2o5-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
The only caller of befs_find_brun_direct is befs_fblock2brun, which
already validates that the block is within the range of direct blocks.
So remove the duplicate validation.

Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
---
 fs/befs/datastream.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
index 26cc417..e224b9a 100644
--- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
+++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
@@ -249,17 +249,9 @@ befs_find_brun_direct(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *data,
 	int i;
 	const befs_block_run *array = data->direct;
 	befs_blocknr_t sum;
-	befs_blocknr_t max_block =
-	    data->max_direct_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
 
 	befs_debug(sb, "---> %s, find %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)blockno);
 
-	if (blockno > max_block) {
-		befs_error(sb, "%s passed block outside of direct region",
-			   __func__);
-		return BEFS_ERR;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < BEFS_NUM_DIRECT_BLOCKS;
 	     sum += array[i].len, i++) {
 		if (blockno >= sum && blockno < sum + (array[i].len)) {
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1451019 — [RESEND PATCH 3/4] fs: befs: Remove useless calls to brelse in befs_find_brun_dblindirect

FromSalah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
Subject[RESEND PATCH 3/4] fs: befs: Remove useless calls to brelse in befs_find_brun_dblindirect
Message-ID<rZny1-2o5-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1451018
The calls to brelse are useless since dbl_indir_block and indir_block
are NULL.

Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
---
 fs/befs/datastream.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
index e224b9a..b68b6f9 100644
--- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
+++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
@@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ befs_find_brun_dblindirect(struct super_block *sb,
 			   (unsigned long)
 			   iaddr2blockno(sb, &data->double_indirect) +
 			   dbl_which_block);
-		brelse(dbl_indir_block);
 		return BEFS_ERR;
 	}
 
@@ -496,7 +495,6 @@ befs_find_brun_dblindirect(struct super_block *sb,
 		befs_error(sb, "%s couldn't read the indirect block "
 			   "at blockno %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)
 			   iaddr2blockno(sb, &indir_run) + which_block);
-		brelse(indir_block);
 		return BEFS_ERR;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1451020 — [RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr

FromSalah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-27 05:20 +0200
Subject[RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr
Message-ID<rZny1-2o5-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1451018
Since goto statement merely returns NULL, replace it with return
statement.

Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
---
 fs/befs/io.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/befs/io.c b/fs/befs/io.c
index 4223b77..af631a6 100644
--- a/fs/befs/io.c
+++ b/fs/befs/io.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ befs_bread_iaddr(struct super_block *sb, befs_inode_addr iaddr)
 	if (iaddr.allocation_group > befs_sb->num_ags) {
 		befs_error(sb, "BEFS: Invalid allocation group %u, max is %u",
 			   iaddr.allocation_group, befs_sb->num_ags);
-		goto error;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	block = iaddr2blockno(sb, &iaddr);
@@ -49,13 +49,9 @@ befs_bread_iaddr(struct super_block *sb, befs_inode_addr iaddr)
 	if (bh == NULL) {
 		befs_error(sb, "Failed to read block %lu",
 			   (unsigned long)block);
-		goto error;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s", __func__);
 	return bh;
-
-      error:
-	befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s ERROR", __func__);
-	return NULL;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1451362 — Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr

FromLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Date2016-07-27 17:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] fs: befs: Remove goto from befs_bread_iaddr
Message-ID<rZz6a-1cX-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1451020
On 27/07/16 04:11, Salah Triki wrote:
> Since goto statement merely returns NULL, replace it with return
> statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/befs/io.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/befs/io.c b/fs/befs/io.c
> index 4223b77..af631a6 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/io.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/io.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ befs_bread_iaddr(struct super_block *sb, befs_inode_addr iaddr)
>  	if (iaddr.allocation_group > befs_sb->num_ags) {
>  		befs_error(sb, "BEFS: Invalid allocation group %u, max is %u",
>  			   iaddr.allocation_group, befs_sb->num_ags);
> -		goto error;
> +		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	block = iaddr2blockno(sb, &iaddr);
> @@ -49,13 +49,9 @@ befs_bread_iaddr(struct super_block *sb, befs_inode_addr iaddr)
>  	if (bh == NULL) {
>  		befs_error(sb, "Failed to read block %lu",
>  			   (unsigned long)block);
> -		goto error;
> +		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s", __func__);
>  	return bh;
> -
> -      error:
> -	befs_debug(sb, "<--- %s ERROR", __func__);
> -	return NULL;
>  }
> 

Hi Salah,

The goto statement also calls the debug function. I  know it doesn't look pretty
to have "debug; return; label; debug; return;", but I find these debug calls at
the start and end of functions very useful when reading dmesg to see that all
functions entered and exited correctly.

I prefer not removing that befs_debug(... ERROR ...);
Unless anybody else agree this is a good patch.

Thanks,
Luis

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1451353 — Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct

FromLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Date2016-07-27 17:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct
Message-ID<rZyWu-19P-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1451018
On 27/07/16 04:11, Salah Triki wrote:
> The only caller of befs_find_brun_direct is befs_fblock2brun, which
> already validates that the block is within the range of direct blocks.
> So remove the duplicate validation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
>  fs/befs/datastream.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> index 26cc417..e224b9a 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
> @@ -249,17 +249,9 @@ befs_find_brun_direct(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *data,
>  	int i;
>  	const befs_block_run *array = data->direct;
>  	befs_blocknr_t sum;
> -	befs_blocknr_t max_block =
> -	    data->max_direct_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
>  
>  	befs_debug(sb, "---> %s, find %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)blockno);
>  
> -	if (blockno > max_block) {
> -		befs_error(sb, "%s passed block outside of direct region",
> -			   __func__);
> -		return BEFS_ERR;
> -	}
> -
>  	for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < BEFS_NUM_DIRECT_BLOCKS;
>  	     sum += array[i].len, i++) {
>  		if (blockno >= sum && blockno < sum + (array[i].len)) {
> 

Hi,

I have applied 1, 2 and 3 from this series into:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next

I had already tested and acked the 3 commits above. Having them in the above git
branch [0] makes it easier to see the order of all recent commits.

Andrew,
I hope this process works for you. If not, let me know and I can adapt to however
you prefer it to be.

Thanks Salah :)

Luis



[0] reason for that git branch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/533

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web