Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442910 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe() Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe() |
| Message-ID | <rUAvU-Hu-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 20:50:09 +0200 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (2): > Return directly after a failed kzalloc() > Remove two OOM messages I do not see a compelling reason for taking these... Thanks. -- Dmitry
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web