Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe()

From	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe()
Date	2016-07-14 00:10 +0200
Message-ID	<rUAvU-Hu-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQysF-7lA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 20:50:09 +0200
> 
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Return directly after a failed kzalloc()
>   Remove two OOM messages

I do not see a compelling reason for taking these...

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in  psif_probe() Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 00:10 +0200

csiph-web