Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1436403 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-04 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-05 11:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> - 2016-07-04 13:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-07-05 09:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> - 2016-07-05 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-07-05 11:00 +0200
| From | Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-04 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock |
| Message-ID | <rR9Vg-4SC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called with rtc clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call. Lets clean it up. Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c index d01ad7e..b083840 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c @@ -577,8 +577,6 @@ static int s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) s3c_rtc_setfreq(info, 1); - s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info); - return 0; err_nortc: -- 1.7.10.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 09:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock |
| Message-ID | <rRsOe-84a-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1436403 |
On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called with rtc > clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call. > Lets clean it up. Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled... otherwise counters get mixed. So overall this looks like wrong approach unless I am missing something? Best regards, Krzysztof > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > index d01ad7e..b083840 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > @@ -577,8 +577,6 @@ static int s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > s3c_rtc_setfreq(info, 1); > > - s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info); > - > return 0; > > err_nortc:
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock |
| Message-ID | <rRudj-qd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1436811 |
Hi Krzsztof,
On 07/05/2016 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called with rtc
>> clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call.
>> Lets clean it up.
>
> Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then
> s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled...
> otherwise counters get mixed.
>
The clock is always disabled when it reach s3c_rtc_setfreq() in probe(),
because s3c_rtc_gettime() will always disable the clock.
As far as s3c_rtc_setaie() is concern, it enables clock while entering
and disables it while leaving the function. And in
s3c_rtc_{enable,disable}_clk() there is check info->clk_disabled flag
which will make sure clock balancing.
> So overall this looks like wrong approach unless I am missing something?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> index d01ad7e..b083840 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
>> @@ -577,8 +577,6 @@ static int s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> s3c_rtc_setfreq(info, 1);
>>
>> - s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info);
>> -
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_nortc:
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 11:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable already disabled clock |
| Message-ID | <rRun0-ty-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1436846 |
On 07/05/2016 10:46 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Krzsztof,
>
> On 07/05/2016 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called
>>> with rtc
>>> clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call.
>>> Lets clean it up.
>>
>> Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then
>> s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled...
>> otherwise counters get mixed.
>>
>
> The clock is always disabled when it reach s3c_rtc_setfreq() in probe(),
> because s3c_rtc_gettime() will always disable the clock.
>
> As far as s3c_rtc_setaie() is concern, it enables clock while entering
> and disables it while leaving the function. And in
> s3c_rtc_{enable,disable}_clk() there is check info->clk_disabled flag
> which will make sure clock balancing.
Ah, you're right. Looks correct although the information that clock is
disabled because of s3c_rtc_gettime() would be useful in the commit message.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web