Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1433056 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-28 17:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-28 19:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Deleting child qdisc doesn't reset parent to default qdisc? Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 17:20 +0200
Re: Deleting child qdisc doesn't reset parent to default qdisc? Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 19:30 +0200
Re: Deleting child qdisc doesn't reset parent to default qdisc? Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 19:40 +0200
| From | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Deleting child qdisc doesn't reset parent to default qdisc? |
| Message-ID | <rP2XT-kK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > TBF is probably a bad example because it started life as a classless
> > qdisc. There was only one built-in fifo queue that was shaped. Then
> > someone made it classful and changed this behavior. To me it sounds
> > reasonable to have the default behavior restored. At minimal
> > consistency.
>
>
> Then you need to save the initial qdisc (bfifo for TBF) in a special
> place, to make sure the delete operation is guaranteed to succeed.
>
> Or fail the delete if the bfifo can not be allocated.
>
> I can tell that determinism if far more interesting than usability for
> some users occasionally playing with tc.
BTW, I've started to actually work on fixing this, and I've noticed that
TBF behavior actually violates what's stated in pfifo_fast manpage:
==========
Whenever an interface is created, the pfifo_fast qdisc is
automatically used as a queue. If another qdisc is
attached, it preempts the default pfifo_fast, which automatically
returns to function when an existing qdisc is detached.
In this sense this qdisc is magic, and unlike other qdiscs.
==========
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rP4ZI-1y6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1433056 |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote: > BTW, I've started to actually work on fixing this, and I've noticed that > TBF behavior actually violates what's stated in pfifo_fast manpage: > > ========== > Whenever an interface is created, the pfifo_fast qdisc is > automatically used as a queue. If another qdisc is > attached, it preempts the default pfifo_fast, which automatically > returns to function when an existing qdisc is detached. > > In this sense this qdisc is magic, and unlike other qdiscs. > ========== It is out of date, now default qdisc can be set to any other qdisc via /proc. Also, probably due to historical reasons, we don't have a unified default default qdisc, some uses bfifo, some uses pfifo, we may break some existing script if we change that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rP59o-1Ba-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1433161 |
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Cong Wang wrote: > > BTW, I've started to actually work on fixing this, and I've noticed that > > TBF behavior actually violates what's stated in pfifo_fast manpage: > > > > ========== > > Whenever an interface is created, the pfifo_fast qdisc is > > automatically used as a queue. If another qdisc is > > attached, it preempts the default pfifo_fast, which automatically > > returns to function when an existing qdisc is detached. > > > > In this sense this qdisc is magic, and unlike other qdiscs. > > ========== > > It is out of date, now default qdisc can be set to any other qdisc > via /proc. Also, probably due to historical reasons, we don't have > a unified default default qdisc, some uses bfifo, some uses pfifo, > we may break some existing script if we change that. While I do understand that reasoning, I'd argue that unpredictable and unexpected behavior of TBF causing systems with non-working networking is much more likely than any userspace having hard dependency on the fact that default (*) qdisc for TBF is noop. (*) where 'default upon creation' != 'default when reset' Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web