Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1430594 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-26 01:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 01:30 +0200
| From | Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. |
| Message-ID | <rNxCN-7sh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 06/23/2016 09:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes: > >> So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles >> between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32 >> and LP64? > > Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is > aarch32 on aarch64? I also do not see sufficient justification for this ABI break. Thanks, Florian
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-26 01:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. |
| Message-ID | <rO5br-3yu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1430594 |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/23/2016 09:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles >>> between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32 >>> and LP64? >> >> >> Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is >> aarch32 on aarch64? > > > I also do not see sufficient justification for this ABI break. Yury, Can you patch ILP32 glibc to use 64bit integer for utmp struct? > > Thanks, > Florian >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web