Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.

From	Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.
Date	2016-06-26 01:30 +0200
Message-ID	<rO5br-3yu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <rN53P-5jQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN7oZ-6Je-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN7oZ-6Je-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN7Il-6Qs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rNxCN-7sh-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 09:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles
>>> between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32
>>> and LP64?
>>
>>
>> Some armv8 chips do not implement all of armv7, so how relevant is
>> aarch32 on aarch64?
>
>
> I also do not see sufficient justification for this ABI break.

Yury,
  Can you patch ILP32 glibc to use 64bit integer for utmp struct?

>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility  reasons. Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 01:30 +0200

csiph-web