Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1430350 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-24 06:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-26 19:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-24 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-26 19:10 +0200
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-24 06:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow |
| Message-ID | <rNqUH-3pa-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If we overflow the stack, print_context_stack will abort. Detect
this case and rewind back into the valid part of the stack so that
we can trace it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 4592bc4ed3e1..4538f7ca9072 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline int valid_stack_ptr(struct task_struct *task,
else
return 0;
}
- return p > t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - size;
+ return p >= t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - size;
}
unsigned long
@@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ print_context_stack(struct task_struct *task,
{
struct stack_frame *frame = (struct stack_frame *)bp;
+ /*
+ * If we overflowed the stack into a guard page, jump back to the
+ * bottom of the usable stack.
+ */
+ if ((unsigned long)task->stack - (unsigned long)stack < PAGE_SIZE)
+ stack = (unsigned long *)task->stack;
+
while (valid_stack_ptr(task, stack, sizeof(*stack), end)) {
unsigned long addr;
--
2.5.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-24 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow |
| Message-ID | <rNBn4-1op-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1430350 |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > If we overflow the stack, print_context_stack will abort. Detect > this case and rewind back into the valid part of the stack so that > we can trace it. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> -- Josh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-26 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 13/16] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow |
| Message-ID | <rOlJf-5Em-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1430765 |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:23:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> If we overflow the stack, print_context_stack will abort. Detect >> this case and rewind back into the valid part of the stack so that >> we can trace it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> > FWIW, I'm making a trivial change here for v4: task->stack -> task_stack_page(task). Since it seems inconsequential, I'm keeping your reviewed-by. > -- > Josh -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web