Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1427237 > unrolled thread

[PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence

Started byYisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com>
First post2016-06-21 05:50 +0200
Last post2016-06-22 03:40 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-21 05:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-21 12:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.zhuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-22 03:40 +0200

#1427237 — [PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence

FromYisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com>
Date2016-06-21 05:50 +0200
Subject[PATCH net-next 01/19] net: hns: bug fix of ge reset sequence
Message-ID<rMkRj-qs-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>

The bit fileds of PPE reset register are different between HNS v1 and
HNS v2, but the current procedure just only match HNS v1. Here is a
patch to fix it.

Signed-off-by: Kejian Yan <yankejian@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
index 96cb628..09e60d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
@@ -271,7 +271,11 @@ static void hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port(struct dsaf_device *dsaf_dev, u32 port,
 		}
 	} else {
 		reg_val_1 = 0x15540 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
-		reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
+
+		if (AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver))
+			reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
+		else
+			reg_val_2 = 0x40 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
 
 		if (!dereset) {
 			dsaf_write_sub(dsaf_dev, DSAF_SUB_SC_GE_RESET_REQ1_REG,
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1427589

FromAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-06-21 12:40 +0200
Message-ID<rMrg7-4Cx-59@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1427237
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:56 +0800, Yisen Zhuang wrote:
> From: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>
> 
> The bit fileds of PPE reset register are different between HNS v1 and
> HNS v2, but the current procedure just only match HNS v1. Here is a
> patch to fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kejian Yan <yankejian@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
> index 96cb628..09e60d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
> @@ -271,7 +271,11 @@ static void hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port(struct
> dsaf_device *dsaf_dev, u32 port,
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		reg_val_1 = 0x15540 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
> -		reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
> +
> +		if (AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver))
> +			reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
> +		else
> +			reg_val_2 = 0x40 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;

reg_val_1 = 0x15540;
reg_val_2 = AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver) ? 0x100 : 0x40;

reg_val_1 <<= dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
reg_val_2 <<= dsaf_dev-
>reset_offset;


>  
>  		if (!dereset) {
>  			dsaf_write_sub(dsaf_dev,
> DSAF_SUB_SC_GE_RESET_REQ1_REG,

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1428324

FromYisen Zhuang <Yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>
Date2016-06-22 03:40 +0200
Message-ID<rMFj4-5aW-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1427589

在 2016/6/21 18:35, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:56 +0800, Yisen Zhuang wrote:
>> From: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>
>>
>> The bit fileds of PPE reset register are different between HNS v1 and
>> HNS v2, but the current procedure just only match HNS v1. Here is a
>> patch to fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kejian Yan <yankejian@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qianqian Xie <xieqianqian@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yisen Zhuang <Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
>> index 96cb628..09e60d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
>> @@ -271,7 +271,11 @@ static void hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port(struct
>> dsaf_device *dsaf_dev, u32 port,
>>  		}
>>  	} else {
>>  		reg_val_1 = 0x15540 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
>> -		reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
>> +
>> +		if (AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver))
>> +			reg_val_2 = 0x100 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
>> +		else
>> +			reg_val_2 = 0x40 << dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
> 
> reg_val_1 = 0x15540;
> reg_val_2 = AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver) ? 0x100 : 0x40;
> 
> reg_val_1 <<= dsaf_dev->reset_offset;
> reg_val_2 <<= dsaf_dev-

I will fix it with a new patch.

Thanks,

Yisen

>> reset_offset;
> 
> 
>>  
>>  		if (!dereset) {
>>  			dsaf_write_sub(dsaf_dev,
>> DSAF_SUB_SC_GE_RESET_REQ1_REG,
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web