Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1422859 > unrolled thread

select on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C

Started byAndreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@fau.de>
First post2016-06-15 12:10 +0200
Last post2016-06-15 16:50 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  select on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C Andreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@fau.de> - 2016-06-15 12:10 +0200
    Re: select on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-15 16:50 +0200
    Re: select on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2016-06-15 16:50 +0200

#1422859 — select on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C

FromAndreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@fau.de>
Date2016-06-15 12:10 +0200
Subjectselect on non-existing Kconfig option CRC32C
Message-ID<rKfVM-1co-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Hendrik,

your patch "s390/crc32-vx: add crypto API module for optimized CRC-32
algorithms" showed up in linux-next today (next-20160615) as commit 	364148e0b195.

The patch defines the Kconfig option CRYPTO_CRC32_S390 which 'select's CRC32C.
However, this should probably have been CRYPTO_CRC32C, as CRC32C does not exist.
Should I prepare a trivial patch to fix this up or would you like to do that on
your side?

I found this issue by comparing yesterday's tree and today's tree using
'scripts/checkkconfigsymbols -f -d next-20160614..next-20160615'.

Best regards,

Andreas

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1423096

FromHendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-06-15 16:50 +0200
Message-ID<rKkiK-3Lp-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1422859
Hi Andreas,

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:00:59PM +0200, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> 
> your patch "s390/crc32-vx: add crypto API module for optimized CRC-32
> algorithms" showed up in linux-next today (next-20160615) as commit 	364148e0b195.
> 
> The patch defines the Kconfig option CRYPTO_CRC32_S390 which 'select's CRC32C.
> However, this should probably have been CRYPTO_CRC32C, as CRC32C does not exist.

Thanks for informing me.  Actually, the crc32-vx driver requires the
__crc32c_le() function which is available by selecting CONFIG_CRC32. There is
no need for CRYPTO_CRC32C.  So this can be safely removed.

> Should I prepare a trivial patch to fix this up or would you like to do that on
> your side?

Martin have already corrected the patch.

Thanks and kind regards,
  Hendrik

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1423097

FromRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date2016-06-15 16:50 +0200
Message-ID<rKkiK-3Lp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1422859
On 06/15/16 03:00, Andreas Ziegler wrote:
> Hi Hendrik,
> 
> your patch "s390/crc32-vx: add crypto API module for optimized CRC-32
> algorithms" showed up in linux-next today (next-20160615) as commit 	364148e0b195.
> 
> The patch defines the Kconfig option CRYPTO_CRC32_S390 which 'select's CRC32C.
> However, this should probably have been CRYPTO_CRC32C, as CRC32C does not exist.
> Should I prepare a trivial patch to fix this up or would you like to do that on
> your side?
> 
> I found this issue by comparing yesterday's tree and today's tree using
> 'scripts/checkkconfigsymbols -f -d next-20160614..next-20160615'.

or should it select CRC32 or LIBCRC32C?  (probably not the LIB... one)

-- 
~Randy

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web