Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1420250 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

Started byShawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
First post2016-06-12 13:50 +0200
Last post2016-06-12 15:30 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-12 13:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 14:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 14:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-12 15:30 +0200

#1420250 — Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents

FromShawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date2016-06-12 13:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents
Message-ID<rJc3U-88s-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock
> since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set.
> Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only.
> 
> Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to
> reference manual.
> Other plls have the same issue.
> 
> e.g. before fix, the pll tree is:
> osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
>    pll1_bypass_src                       0            0    24000000          0 0
>       pll1                               0            0   792000000          0 0
>          pll1_bypass                     0            0   792000000          0 0
>             pll1_sys                     0            0   792000000          0 0
> 
> After the fix, it's:
> osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
>    pll1                                  0            0   792000000          0 0
>       pll1_bypass                        0            0   792000000          0 0
>          pll1_sys                        0            0   792000000          0 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>

I squashed 7 ~ 11 into one patch and applied it, thanks.

Shawn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1420253

FromDong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-12 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<rJcdA-8bT-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1420250
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock
> > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set.
> > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only.
> > 
> > Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to
> > reference manual.
> > Other plls have the same issue.
> > 
> > e.g. before fix, the pll tree is:
> > osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
> >    pll1_bypass_src                       0            0    24000000          0 0
> >       pll1                               0            0   792000000          0 0
> >          pll1_bypass                     0            0   792000000          0 0
> >             pll1_sys                     0            0   792000000          0 0
> > 
> > After the fix, it's:
> > osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
> >    pll1                                  0            0   792000000          0 0
> >       pll1_bypass                        0            0   792000000          0 0
> >          pll1_sys                        0            0   792000000          0 0
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> 
> I squashed 7 ~ 11 into one patch and applied it, thanks.
> 

I'm fine.
Thanks

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> Shawn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1420260

FromDong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-12 14:30 +0200
Message-ID<rJcGB-ba-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1420253
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:52:04PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:43:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock
> > > since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set.
> > > Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only.
> > > 
> > > Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to
> > > reference manual.
> > > Other plls have the same issue.
> > > 
> > > e.g. before fix, the pll tree is:
> > > osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
> > >    pll1_bypass_src                       0            0    24000000          0 0
> > >       pll1                               0            0   792000000          0 0
> > >          pll1_bypass                     0            0   792000000          0 0
> > >             pll1_sys                     0            0   792000000          0 0
> > > 
> > > After the fix, it's:
> > > osc                                      6            6    24000000          0 0
> > >    pll1                                  0            0   792000000          0 0
> > >       pll1_bypass                        0            0   792000000          0 0
> > >          pll1_sys                        0            0   792000000          0 0
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> > 
> > I squashed 7 ~ 11 into one patch and applied it, thanks.
> > 
> 
> I'm fine.
> Thanks
> 

You probably may need to change the patch title after merge.
clk: imx: fix pll clock parents

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
> 
> > Shawn
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1420270

FromShawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date2016-06-12 15:30 +0200
Message-ID<rJdCG-JU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1420260
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:19:47PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> You probably may need to change the patch title after merge.
> clk: imx: fix pll clock parents

Right, thanks for the reminding.

Shawn

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web