Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1420966 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES

Started byDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
First post2016-06-13 17:10 +0200
Last post2016-06-13 23:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead  of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-06-13 17:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-13 23:00 +0200

#1420966 — Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES

FromDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date2016-06-13 17:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES
Message-ID<rJBEZ-7YP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:29AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> Use cpuidle's CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX macro instead of powernv specific
> MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES.
> 
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1421324 — Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2016-06-13 23:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES
Message-ID<rJH7J-2Zc-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1420966
On Monday, June 13, 2016 05:01:50 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:29AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> > Use cpuidle's CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX macro instead of powernv specific
> > MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES.
> > 
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

Since this seems to depend on some other patches in the series, I'm expecting
it to go in along with the patches it depends on.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web