Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES

From	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES
Date	2016-06-13 23:00 +0200
Message-ID	<rJH7J-2Zc-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rHOZH-2EF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHOZI-2EF-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJBEZ-7YP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, June 13, 2016 05:01:50 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:29AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> > Use cpuidle's CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX macro instead of powernv specific
> > MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES.
> > 
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

Since this seems to depend on some other patches in the series, I'm expecting
it to go in along with the patches it depends on.

Thanks,
Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead  of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-06-13 17:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-13 23:00 +0200

csiph-web