Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1414704 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-06 09:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-10 18:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/3] PCI: Use device_match_always() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Use device_match_always() Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2016-06-10 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Use device_match_always() Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 18:40 +0200
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Use device_match_always() |
| Message-ID | <rGXiG-1OJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
There is now a common implementation for a match function that will
always match, so the PCI-specific implementation can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 8e3ef720997d..3db06d8d6497 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ static struct resource *get_pci_domain_busn_res(int domain_nr)
return &r->res;
}
-static int find_anything(struct device *dev, void *data)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
/*
* Some device drivers need know if pci is initiated.
* Basically, we think pci is not initiated when there
@@ -77,7 +72,7 @@ int no_pci_devices(void)
struct device *dev;
int no_devices;
- dev = bus_find_device(&pci_bus_type, NULL, NULL, find_anything);
+ dev = bus_find_device(&pci_bus_type, NULL, NULL, device_match_always);
no_devices = (dev == NULL);
put_device(dev);
return no_devices;
--
2.8.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rIxk5-6Qd-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1414704 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:32:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> There is now a common implementation for a match function that will
> always match, so the PCI-specific implementation can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
I'm sort of OK with this. It's clearly not going to break anything.
But I would far rather figure out a way to remove no_pci_devices()
completely. There's only one in-tree caller, and it's sort of
dubious, although the idea was added by Linus (2bff5e94f1bf).
I suppose nowadays we would use ACPI or DMI to do this. But I guess
this is OK as-is. It'd be pretty hard to find a PC110 to test any
real driver changes.
I assume all three of these patches would get merged together by
somebody else.
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 8e3ef720997d..3db06d8d6497 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ static struct resource *get_pci_domain_busn_res(int domain_nr)
> return &r->res;
> }
>
> -static int find_anything(struct device *dev, void *data)
> -{
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Some device drivers need know if pci is initiated.
> * Basically, we think pci is not initiated when there
> @@ -77,7 +72,7 @@ int no_pci_devices(void)
> struct device *dev;
> int no_devices;
>
> - dev = bus_find_device(&pci_bus_type, NULL, NULL, find_anything);
> + dev = bus_find_device(&pci_bus_type, NULL, NULL, device_match_always);
> no_devices = (dev == NULL);
> put_device(dev);
> return no_devices;
> --
> 2.8.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rIxDs-6XO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1419562 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:13:43AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:32:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> > > > > There is now a common implementation for a match function that will > > always match, so the PCI-specific implementation can be removed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > I'm sort of OK with this. It's clearly not going to break anything. > > But I would far rather figure out a way to remove no_pci_devices() > completely. There's only one in-tree caller, and it's sort of > dubious, although the idea was added by Linus (2bff5e94f1bf). This is sort of a spin-off from another series that I sent out, which introduced a common function that was used in far more places and has a more clearly legitimate use. While working on that other series the duplication here occurred to me, so I thought I'd remove it while at it, even if there are only two occurrences. > I suppose nowadays we would use ACPI or DMI to do this. But I guess > this is OK as-is. It'd be pretty hard to find a PC110 to test any > real driver changes. > > I assume all three of these patches would get merged together by > somebody else. I was thinking Greg could take them through the driver core tree. Thierry
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web