Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415738 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-07 08:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-07 16:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2 0/2] xen-pciback: correct and clean up BAR handling "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 08:30 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-06-07 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 16:20 +0200
[PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar,rom}_init() "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar,rom}_init() Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2016-06-07 16:10 +0200
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 0/2] xen-pciback: correct and clean up BAR handling |
| Message-ID | <rHiGt-7uM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
1: return proper values during BAR sizing
2: clean up {bar,rom}_init()
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
v2: Fold (and extend) patches 2 and 3. Patch 1 is unchanged.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 08:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing |
| Message-ID | <rHiQa-7y0-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415738 |
Reads following writes with all address bits set to 1 should return all
changeable address bits as one, not the BAR size (nor, as was the case
for the upper half of 64-bit BARs, the high half of the region's end
address). Presumably this didn't cause any problems so far because
consumers use the value to calculate the size (usually via val & -val),
and do nothing else with it.
But also consider the exception here: Unimplemented BARs should always
return all zeroes.
And finally, the check for whether to return the sizing address on read
for the ROM BAR should ignore all non-address bits, not just the ROM
Enable one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
---
drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR.orig/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
+++ 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int rom_write(struct pci_dev *dev
/* A write to obtain the length must happen as a 32-bit write.
* This does not (yet) support writing individual bytes
*/
- if (value == ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+ if ((value | ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK) == ~0)
bar->which = 1;
else {
u32 tmpval;
@@ -225,38 +225,42 @@ static inline void read_dev_bar(struct p
(PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY |
PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))) {
bar_info->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32;
- bar_info->len_val = res[pos - 1].end >> 32;
+ bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32;
return;
}
}
+ if (!res[pos].flags ||
+ (res[pos].flags & (IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET |
+ IORESOURCE_BUSY)))
+ return;
+
bar_info->val = res[pos].start |
(res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
- bar_info->len_val = resource_size(&res[pos]);
+ bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos]) |
+ (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
}
static void *bar_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kmalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bar)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~0);
- bar->which = 0;
return bar;
}
static void *rom_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kmalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bar)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE);
- bar->which = 0;
return bar;
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 16:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing |
| Message-ID | <rHpRD-3Ha-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415747 |
On 06/07/2016 02:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Reads following writes with all address bits set to 1 should return all > changeable address bits as one, not the BAR size (nor, as was the case > for the upper half of 64-bit BARs, the high half of the region's end > address). Presumably this didn't cause any problems so far because > consumers use the value to calculate the size (usually via val & -val), > and do nothing else with it. > > But also consider the exception here: Unimplemented BARs should always > return all zeroes. > > And finally, the check for whether to return the sizing address on read > for the ROM BAR should ignore all non-address bits, not just the ROM > Enable one. Should this go to stable trees as well? -boris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen-pciback: return proper values during BAR sizing |
| Message-ID | <rHq1j-3KB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416224 |
>>> On 07.06.16 at 16:06, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote: > On 06/07/2016 02:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Reads following writes with all address bits set to 1 should return all >> changeable address bits as one, not the BAR size (nor, as was the case >> for the upper half of 64-bit BARs, the high half of the region's end >> address). Presumably this didn't cause any problems so far because >> consumers use the value to calculate the size (usually via val & -val), >> and do nothing else with it. >> >> But also consider the exception here: Unimplemented BARs should always >> return all zeroes. >> >> And finally, the check for whether to return the sizing address on read >> for the ROM BAR should ignore all non-address bits, not just the ROM >> Enable one. > > > Should this go to stable trees as well? Not sure - we had no active reports of problems. The context this was found in did not really have an issue because it was broken. I guess I'll leave this to you maintainers... Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 08:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar,rom}_init() |
| Message-ID | <rHiQa-7y0-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415738 |
- drop unused function parameter of read_dev_bar()
- drop rom_init() (now identical to bar_init())
- fold read_dev_bar() into its now single caller
- simplify determination of 64-bit memory resource
- use const and unsigned
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
v2: fold in 3rd patch and drop read_dev_bar() (as requested by Boris)
---
drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 57 ++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
--- 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR.orig/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
+++ 4.7-rc2-xen-pciback-BAR/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c
@@ -209,58 +209,35 @@ static int bar_read(struct pci_dev *dev,
return 0;
}
-static inline void read_dev_bar(struct pci_dev *dev,
- struct pci_bar_info *bar_info, int offset,
- u32 len_mask)
+static void *bar_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
{
- int pos;
- struct resource *res = dev->resource;
+ unsigned int pos;
+ const struct resource *res = dev->resource;
+ struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!bar)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (offset == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS || offset == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1)
pos = PCI_ROM_RESOURCE;
else {
pos = (offset - PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0) / 4;
- if (pos && ((res[pos - 1].flags & (PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE |
- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_MASK)) ==
- (PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY |
- PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))) {
- bar_info->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32;
- bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32;
- return;
+ if (pos && (res[pos - 1].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64)) {
+ bar->val = res[pos - 1].start >> 32;
+ bar->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos - 1]) >> 32;
+ return bar;
}
}
if (!res[pos].flags ||
(res[pos].flags & (IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET |
IORESOURCE_BUSY)))
- return;
-
- bar_info->val = res[pos].start |
- (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
- bar_info->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos]) |
- (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
-}
+ return bar;
-static void *bar_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
-{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!bar)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~0);
-
- return bar;
-}
-
-static void *rom_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
-{
- struct pci_bar_info *bar = kzalloc(sizeof(*bar), GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!bar)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- read_dev_bar(dev, bar, offset, ~PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE);
+ bar->val = res[pos].start |
+ (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
+ bar->len_val = -resource_size(&res[pos]) |
+ (res[pos].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK);
return bar;
}
@@ -383,7 +360,7 @@ static const struct config_field header_
{ \
.offset = reg_offset, \
.size = 4, \
- .init = rom_init, \
+ .init = bar_init, \
.reset = bar_reset, \
.release = bar_release, \
.u.dw.read = bar_read, \
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 16:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen-pciback: clean up {bar,rom}_init() |
| Message-ID | <rHpRE-3Ha-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415749 |
On 06/07/2016 02:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > - drop unused function parameter of read_dev_bar() > - drop rom_init() (now identical to bar_init()) > - fold read_dev_bar() into its now single caller > - simplify determination of 64-bit memory resource > - use const and unsigned > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web