Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1416894 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-08 08:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-10 09:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> - 2016-06-08 08:20 +0200
Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> - 2016-06-08 12:20 +0200
Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> - 2016-06-08 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-06-10 09:20 +0200
| From | Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 08:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets |
| Message-ID | <rHF0l-4MH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The device emulation may send segCnt of 1 for LRO packets. Signed-off-by: Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jin Heo <heoj@vmware.com> --- v2: fix subject line --- drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 2 +- drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c index db8022a..6f399b2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete(struct vmxnet3_rx_queue *rq, rcdlro = (struct Vmxnet3_RxCompDescExt *)rcd; segCnt = rcdlro->segCnt; - BUG_ON(segCnt <= 1); + BUG_ON(segCnt == 0); mss = rcdlro->mss; if (unlikely(segCnt <= 1)) segCnt = 0; diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h index c482539..3d2b64e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h @@ -69,10 +69,10 @@ /* * Version numbers */ -#define VMXNET3_DRIVER_VERSION_STRING "1.4.7.0-k" +#define VMXNET3_DRIVER_VERSION_STRING "1.4.8.0-k" /* a 32-bit int, each byte encode a verion number in VMXNET3_DRIVER_VERSION */ -#define VMXNET3_DRIVER_VERSION_NUM 0x01040700 +#define VMXNET3_DRIVER_VERSION_NUM 0x01040800 #if defined(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) /* RSS only makes sense if MSI-X is supported. */ -- 2.8.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 12:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets |
| Message-ID | <rHIKC-7iL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416894 |
On 06/08/2016 08:13 AM, Shrikrishna Khare wrote: > The device emulation may send segCnt of 1 for LRO packets. > > Signed-off-by: Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> > Signed-off-by: Jin Heo <heoj@vmware.com> > > --- > v2: fix subject line > --- > drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_int.h | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c > index db8022a..6f399b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c > @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ vmxnet3_rq_rx_complete(struct vmxnet3_rx_queue *rq, > rcdlro = (struct Vmxnet3_RxCompDescExt *)rcd; > > segCnt = rcdlro->segCnt; > - BUG_ON(segCnt <= 1); > + BUG_ON(segCnt == 0); What will the vmxnet3 driver do otherwise if segCnt == 0? Please see below. > mss = rcdlro->mss; > if (unlikely(segCnt <= 1)) > segCnt = 0; Based on this code, it looks like it can handle the case without taking down the kernel completely, so instead of a "BUG_ON", would it make sense with a WARN_ON_ONCE() or WARN_ON()? Thanks, Thomas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 16:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH net v2] vmxnet3: segCnt can be 1 for LRO packets |
| Message-ID | <rHMXT-1pV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1417248 |
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > > mss = rcdlro->mss; > > if (unlikely(segCnt <= 1)) > > segCnt = 0; > > Based on this code, it looks like it can handle the case without taking > down the kernel completely, so instead of a > "BUG_ON", would it make sense with a WARN_ON_ONCE() or WARN_ON()? Thanks for the review Thomas. I fixed the code to use WARN_ON_ONCE. Sent out revised patch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rIoTw-1zi-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416894 |
From: Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:13:35 -0700 > The device emulation may send segCnt of 1 for LRO packets. > > Signed-off-by: Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com> > Signed-off-by: Jin Heo <heoj@vmware.com> Applied.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web