Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1411379 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-06-01 18:20 +0200
Last post2016-06-01 19:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-06-01 18:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-01 19:40 +0200

#1411379 — Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-06-01 18:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review
Message-ID<rFh2a-2cp-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:13:51AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-queue boot: 114 boots: 0 failed, 113 passed with 1 offline (v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
> 
> Tree: stable-queue
> Branch: local/linux-3.14.y.queue
> Git Describe: v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52
> Git Commit: d418e2694f52920287328d0fc839ed59c8a47280
> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
> Tested: 39 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 21 builds out of 129
> 
> Offline Platforms:
> 
> arm:
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y:
>         omap3-overo-storm-tobi: 1 offline lab

I'll assume this means all is good :)

And really, I don't care is something is "offline", there's not much any
of us can do about it, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1411424

FromKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Date2016-06-01 19:40 +0200
Message-ID<rFihA-2VQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1411379
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:13:51AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 114 boots: 0 failed, 113 passed with 1 offline (v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-3.14.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52
>> Git Commit: d418e2694f52920287328d0fc839ed59c8a47280
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 39 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 21 builds out of 129
>> 
>> Offline Platforms:
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y:
>>         omap3-overo-storm-tobi: 1 offline lab
>
> I'll assume this means all is good :)

Yes.

> And really, I don't care is something is "offline", there's not much any
> of us can do about it, right?

That's correct.  Only actual failures should concern you.

The offline board info is there for the lab owners.

Kevin

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web