Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review

From	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review
Date	2016-06-01 19:40 +0200
Message-ID	<rFihA-2VQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rECs2-VP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFh2a-2cp-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFh2a-2cp-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	BayLibre

Show all headers | View raw

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:13:51AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 114 boots: 0 failed, 113 passed with 1 offline (v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-3.14.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v3.14.70-20-gd418e2694f52
>> Git Commit: d418e2694f52920287328d0fc839ed59c8a47280
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 39 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 21 builds out of 129
>> 
>> Offline Platforms:
>> 
>> arm:
>> 
>>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_EFI=y:
>>         omap3-overo-storm-tobi: 1 offline lab
>
> I'll assume this means all is good :)

Yes.

> And really, I don't care is something is "offline", there's not much any
> of us can do about it, right?

That's correct.  Only actual failures should concern you.

The offline board info is there for the lab owners.

Kevin

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-06-01 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/20] 3.14.71-stable review Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-01 19:40 +0200

csiph-web