Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1412942 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-06-03 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-06-03 11:10 +0200

#1412942 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:

[...]

> > +	} else {
> > +		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0,
> > +					&rockchip_pcie_ops, port, &res);
> > +	}
> > +	if (!bus)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> 
> Why do you have catter for the PCI_PROBE_ONLY case? Nobody should ever
> use that for properly implemented HW.

I think that's just copy and paste and it is a useless check given
that the only way we can set that flag on ARM/ARM64 is through DT
(of_pci_check_probe_only()) and I doubt that systems probing this
driver really require a PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-up.

So, unless you can explain to us why it is really needed, please
remove the:

if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))

check.

Lorenzo

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1412952

On 03/06/16 09:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0,
>>> +					&rockchip_pcie_ops, port, &res);
>>> +	}
>>> +	if (!bus)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>>
>> Why do you have catter for the PCI_PROBE_ONLY case? Nobody should ever
>> use that for properly implemented HW.
> 
> I think that's just copy and paste and it is a useless check given
> that the only way we can set that flag on ARM/ARM64 is through DT
> (of_pci_check_probe_only()) and I doubt that systems probing this
> driver really require a PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-up.
> 
> So, unless you can explain to us why it is really needed, please
> remove the:
> 
> if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
> 
> check.

Agreed. Maybe we should add a comment somewhere saying that this is
deprecated on arm/arm64, and only useful to slightly dumb virtualization
environments (kvmtool being the prime example).

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web