Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1412942
| From | Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc |
| Date | 2016-06-03 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rFT7r-Wy-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rAPQS-4i2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAPQS-4i2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDp3P-3nf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> > + } else {
> > + bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0,
> > + &rockchip_pcie_ops, port, &res);
> > + }
> > + if (!bus)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>
> Why do you have catter for the PCI_PROBE_ONLY case? Nobody should ever
> use that for properly implemented HW.
I think that's just copy and paste and it is a useless check given
that the only way we can set that flag on ARM/ARM64 is through DT
(of_pci_check_probe_only()) and I doubt that systems probing this
driver really require a PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-up.
So, unless you can explain to us why it is really needed, please
remove the:
if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
check.
Lorenzo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-06-03 11:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-06-03 11:10 +0200
csiph-web