Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1410591 > unrolled thread

[glibc] preadv/pwritev question

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [glibc] preadv/pwritev question Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-05-31 22:10 +0200
    Re: [glibc] preadv/pwritev question Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> - 2016-05-31 23:40 +0200
      Re: [glibc] preadv/pwritev question Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> - 2016-06-01 00:10 +0200

#1410591 — [glibc] preadv/pwritev question

Hi Chris,

In path a63c7fa18a (Add sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/.) you add
this:
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/preadv.c

[...]

+static ssize_t
+do_preadv (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off_t
offset)
+{
+  assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
+  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
+                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
+                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset));
+}
+

And this is the code that is picked up if I choose wordsize-32 for my
AARCH64/ILP32. So I have questions.

1. What is the assert for? We agreed that all new ABIs will be 64-bit
off_t only.

I fixed it internally like this:
+#ifndef __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T
        assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
+#endif

There is a bunch of similar assertions in glibc.

2. This one looks weird:
__LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset))
Why 31-bit offset? And why you don't mask 2nd argument?
Later in your patch I see this:
+static ssize_t
+do_preadv64 (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off64_t
offset)

+{
+  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
+                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
+                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR ((off_t) (offset >> 32),
+                                           (off_t) (offset & 0xffffffff)));
+}

And it looks correct to me. If 1st version is correct as well, I think
it should be commented.

Yury.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1410644

On 5/31/2016 4:04 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> In path a63c7fa18a (Add sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/.) you add
> this:
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/preadv.c
>
> [...]
>
> +static ssize_t
> +do_preadv (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off_t
> offset)
> +{
> +  assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
> +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
> +                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
> +                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset));
> +}
> +
>
> And this is the code that is picked up if I choose wordsize-32 for my
> AARCH64/ILP32. So I have questions.
>
> 1. What is the assert for? We agreed that all new ABIs will be 64-bit
> off_t only.
>
> I fixed it internally like this:
> +#ifndef __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T
>          assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
> +#endif
>
> There is a bunch of similar assertions in glibc.
>
> 2. This one looks weird:
> __LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset))
> Why 31-bit offset? And why you don't mask 2nd argument?
> Later in your patch I see this:
> +static ssize_t
> +do_preadv64 (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off64_t
> offset)
>
> +{
> +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
> +                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
> +                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR ((off_t) (offset >> 32),
> +                                           (off_t) (offset & 0xffffffff)));
> +}
>
> And it looks correct to me. If 1st version is correct as well, I think
> it should be commented.

I did this work before x32 came out, so I tried to model it more closely on
the existing x86 compat API.  I agree that a 64-bit off_t model seems reasonable;
however, the code does exactly what it does to match x86, namely preadv() takes
a 32-bit offset, and preadv64() take a 64-bit offset.  The assert() in preadv to force
sizeof to be 4 is exactly why in that routine we use (offset >> 31, offset).  Since
we know offset fits in 32 bits, all we need to do is properly sign-extend it into
64 bits in the high register of the pair, which is what (offset >> 31) does - you end
up with only 0 or -1, thus sign-extending the 32-bit signed off_t. Then in
preadv64() we actually need to break apart the 64-bit offset into a high 32 bits
and a low 32 bits, which is what (offset >> 32, offset & 0xffffffff) does.

For a 64-bit off_t you will want to not compile preadv.c at all, and instead make
__libc_preadv() and friends be aliases of __libc_preadv64().

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1410660

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 31 May 2016 17:00, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 5/31/2016 4:04 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> > In path a63c7fa18a (Add sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/.) you add
> > this:
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/preadv.c
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > +static ssize_t
> > +do_preadv (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off_t
> > offset)
> > +{
> > +  assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
> > +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
> > +                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
> > +                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset));
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > And this is the code that is picked up if I choose wordsize-32 for my
> > AARCH64/ILP32. So I have questions.
> >
> > 1. What is the assert for? We agreed that all new ABIs will be 64-bit
> > off_t only.
> >
> > I fixed it internally like this:
> > +#ifndef __OFF_T_MATCHES_OFF64_T
> >          assert (sizeof (offset) == 4);
> > +#endif
> >
> > There is a bunch of similar assertions in glibc.
> >
> > 2. This one looks weird:
> > __LONG_LONG_PAIR (offset >> 31, offset))
> > Why 31-bit offset? And why you don't mask 2nd argument?
> > Later in your patch I see this:
> > +static ssize_t
> > +do_preadv64 (int fd, const struct iovec *vector, int count, off64_t
> > offset)
> >
> > +{
> > +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (preadv, __ALIGNMENT_COUNT (5, 6), fd,
> > +                         vector, count, __ALIGNMENT_ARG
> > +                         __LONG_LONG_PAIR ((off_t) (offset >> 32),
> > +                                           (off_t) (offset & 0xffffffff)));
> > +}
> >
> > And it looks correct to me. If 1st version is correct as well, I think
> > it should be commented.
> 
> I did this work before x32 came out, so I tried to model it more closely on
> the existing x86 compat API.  I agree that a 64-bit off_t model seems reasonable;
> however, the code does exactly what it does to match x86, namely preadv() takes
> a 32-bit offset, and preadv64() take a 64-bit offset.  The assert() in preadv to force
> sizeof to be 4 is exactly why in that routine we use (offset >> 31, offset).  Since
> we know offset fits in 32 bits, all we need to do is properly sign-extend it into
> 64 bits in the high register of the pair, which is what (offset >> 31) does - you end
> up with only 0 or -1, thus sign-extending the 32-bit signed off_t. Then in
> preadv64() we actually need to break apart the 64-bit offset into a high 32 bits
> and a low 32 bits, which is what (offset >> 32, offset & 0xffffffff) does.
> 
> For a 64-bit off_t you will want to not compile preadv.c at all, and instead make
> __libc_preadv() and friends be aliases of __libc_preadv64().

sounds like Adhemerval's pread/pwrite unify work should be extended to
the preadv/pwritev funcs.  it deals with the ilp32 case and uses the new
SYSCALL_LL macro to deal with the ugly shifting/masking.

check out these commits:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=071af4769fcdfe2cd349157b01f27c9571478ace
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=77a4fbd53611720cd6ae845de560df5dd332b28e
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=eeddfa91cbb1a619af135c7a9ac14251ec094b7a
-mike

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web