Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1401279 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-16 04:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2016-05-23 16:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-24 04:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> - 2016-05-23 17:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2016-05-24 04:30 +0200

#1401279 — [PATCH V5 5/6] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI

The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.

ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
method is executed, the OS can resume using the device.

This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
method when reset is requested.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
index d859d3b..095d5b7 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
@@ -73,21 +73,59 @@ int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
+	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+	acpi_status acpi_ret;
+	unsigned long long val;
+
+	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
+	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
+
+	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
+}
 #else
 int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 			     struct device *dev)
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
+
+static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif
 
 static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 {
+	if (vdev->acpihid)
+		return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev);
+
 	return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
 }
 
 static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 {
+	if (vdev->acpihid)
+		return;
+
 	vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
 						    &vdev->reset_module);
 	if (!vdev->of_reset) {
@@ -99,6 +137,9 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 
 static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 {
+	if (vdev->acpihid)
+		return;
+
 	if (vdev->of_reset)
 		module_put(vdev->reset_module);
 }
@@ -177,6 +218,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
 		vdev->of_reset(vdev);
 		return 0;
+	} else if (vdev->acpihid) {
+		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
+		return vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(vdev);
 	}
 
 	dev_warn(vdev->device, "no reset function found!\n");
-- 
1.8.2.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1405418

On 05/16/2016 04:13 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
> 
> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device.
> 
> This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
> method when reset is requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index d859d3b..095d5b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -73,21 +73,59 @@ int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +	acpi_status acpi_ret;
> +	unsigned long long val;
> +
> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +
> +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
> +}
>  #else
>  int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  			     struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> +
> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
nit: inline
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
nit: inline

Besides Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>

It is not explictly written in the ACPI spec that _RST is expected to
stop DMA transfers and IRQs although this may be implicit in the notion
of "function level reset ". May be worth adding this info in the commit msg?

Best Regards

Eric
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev);
> +
>  	return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return;
> +
>  	vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>  						    &vdev->reset_module);
>  	if (!vdev->of_reset) {
> @@ -99,6 +137,9 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (vdev->of_reset)
>  		module_put(vdev->reset_module);
>  }
> @@ -177,6 +218,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>  		vdev->of_reset(vdev);
>  		return 0;
> +	} else if (vdev->acpihid) {
> +		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(vdev);
>  	}
>  
>  	dev_warn(vdev->device, "no reset function found!\n");
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1405781

On 5/23/2016 10:41 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 04:13 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
>> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
>>
>> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
>> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device.
>>
>> This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
>> method when reset is requested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> index d859d3b..095d5b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
>> @@ -73,21 +73,59 @@ int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>  	}
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>> +	acpi_status acpi_ret;
>> +	unsigned long long val;
>> +
>> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>> +
>> +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
>> +}
>>  #else
>>  int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>>  			     struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> +{
> nit: inline
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> nit: inline

sure

> 
> Besides Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>

thanks
 
> It is not explictly written in the ACPI spec that _RST is expected to
> stop DMA transfers and IRQs although this may be implicit in the notion
> of "function level reset ". May be worth adding this info in the commit msg?
> 

yes, I'll add DMA and IRQ requirement to the commit message.

> Best Regards
> 
> Eric
>> +{
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev);
>> +
>>  	return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>>  						    &vdev->reset_module);
>>  	if (!vdev->of_reset) {
>> @@ -99,6 +137,9 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  
>>  static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  {
>> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	if (vdev->of_reset)
>>  		module_put(vdev->reset_module);
>>  }
>> @@ -177,6 +218,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>>  		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>>  		vdev->of_reset(vdev);
>>  		return 0;
>> +	} else if (vdev->acpihid) {
>> +		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(vdev);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	dev_warn(vdev->device, "no reset function found!\n");
>>
> 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1405447

Hi Sinan,
On 05/16/2016 04:13 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
> 
> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device.
> 
> This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
> method when reset is requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index d859d3b..095d5b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -73,21 +73,59 @@ int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +	acpi_status acpi_ret;
> +	unsigned long long val;
> +
> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
> +		return -EINVAL;
Can't you return something more explicit here? The error code will be
visible to the userspace. Difficult for him to understand the cause of
the failure in that case.

Eric
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
> +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> +
> +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
> +}
>  #else
>  int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>  			     struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> +
> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev);
> +
>  	return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return;
> +
>  	vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>  						    &vdev->reset_module);
>  	if (!vdev->of_reset) {
> @@ -99,6 +137,9 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
> +	if (vdev->acpihid)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (vdev->of_reset)
>  		module_put(vdev->reset_module);
>  }
> @@ -177,6 +218,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_call_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
>  		vdev->of_reset(vdev);
>  		return 0;
> +	} else if (vdev->acpihid) {
> +		dev_info(vdev->device, "reset\n");
> +		return vfio_platform_acpi_call_reset(vdev);
>  	}
>  
>  	dev_warn(vdev->device, "no reset function found!\n");
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1405782

On 5/23/2016 11:21 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> +	acpi_ret = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RST", NULL, &val);
>> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
>> > +		return -EINVAL;
> Can't you return something more explicit here? The error code will be
> visible to the userspace. Difficult for him to understand the cause of
> the failure in that case.

I can also add a reset failed message to both DT and ACPI reset calls.

Will that work?

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web