Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1343057 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-01 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-02 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100
| From | Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state |
| Message-ID | <r60Se-1Sg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
This series add checks to make sure that the AArch32 state is
supported before we process the 32bit ID registers. Also
checks the same for COMPAT binary execution.
(Painfully) applies on top of 4.5-rc5 + [1] + [2].
Or it is available here :
git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git noaarch32/v2-4.5-rc5
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/410556.html
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401913.html
Changes since V1:
- Prevent changing the personality to PER_LINUX32 by adding
wrapper for personality() syscall.
- Add the check to KVM before initialising a AArch32 vcpu
- Tested on hardware.
Btw, linux32 doesn't complain when the personality() syscall fails to change
to PER_LINUX32. You can verify the personality by running
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
which would still list the 64bit features for the CPUs.
Suzuki K Poulose (7):
arm64: hwcaps: Cleanup naming
arm64: HWCAP: Split COMPAT HWCAP table entries
arm64: Add helpers for detecting AArch32 support at EL0
arm64: cpufeature: Check availability of AArch32
arm64: cpufeature: Track 32bit EL0 support
arm64: Add a wrapper for personality() syscall
arm64: kvm: Check support for AArch32 for 32bit guests
Yury Norov (1):
arm64: compat: Check for AArch32 state
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 15 ++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 3 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 37 +++----
arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c | 10 ++
9 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r801I-6o3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1343057 |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > This series add checks to make sure that the AArch32 state is > supported before we process the 32bit ID registers. Also > checks the same for COMPAT binary execution. > > (Painfully) applies on top of 4.5-rc5 + [1] + [2]. > > Or it is available here : > git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git noaarch32/v2-4.5-rc5 > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/410556.html > [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401913.html > > Changes since V1: > - Prevent changing the personality to PER_LINUX32 by adding > wrapper for personality() syscall. > - Add the check to KVM before initialising a AArch32 vcpu > - Tested on hardware. > > Btw, linux32 doesn't complain when the personality() syscall fails to change > to PER_LINUX32. You can verify the personality by running > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > which would still list the 64bit features for the CPUs. Hi Suzuki, I have some troubles with access to appropriate hardware to test it, but I didn't forget. Yury.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8gzv-UO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1347029 |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:19:23AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > This series add checks to make sure that the AArch32 state is > > supported before we process the 32bit ID registers. Also > > checks the same for COMPAT binary execution. > > > > (Painfully) applies on top of 4.5-rc5 + [1] + [2]. > > > > Or it is available here : > > git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git noaarch32/v2-4.5-rc5 > > > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/410556.html > > [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401913.html > > > > Changes since V1: > > - Prevent changing the personality to PER_LINUX32 by adding > > wrapper for personality() syscall. > > - Add the check to KVM before initialising a AArch32 vcpu > > - Tested on hardware. > > > > Btw, linux32 doesn't complain when the personality() syscall fails to change > > to PER_LINUX32. You can verify the personality by running > > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > > which would still list the 64bit features for the CPUs. > > Hi Suzuki, > > I have some troubles with access to appropriate hardware to test > it, but I didn't forget. > > Yury. Hi Suzuki, ubuntu@arm64:~$ uname -a Linux arm64 4.5.0-rc5-00019-g3e330b9 #76 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 2 17:46:57 MSK 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux ubuntu@arm64:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0-47 BogoMIPS : 200.00 Features : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 atomics CPU implementer : 0x43 CPU architecture: 8 CPU variant : 0x1 CPU part : 0x0a1 CPU revision : 0 ubuntu@arm64:~$ file readdir readdir: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=aeebc12494450b55a2ab0d39ebd2e121e9085d5c, not stripped W/o 32_EL0: ubuntu@arm64:~$ ./readdir -bash: ./readdir: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error With 32_ELO but w/o your patchset: kernel just hangs (on 4.2 it printed errors, but it was other machine); With 32_EL0 and with your patchset: ubuntu@arm64:~$ ./readdir -bash: ./readdir: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error So, everything is looking OK. Tested-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Yury.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8gST-14i-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1348112 |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:07:21PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > ubuntu@arm64:~$ uname -a > Linux arm64 4.5.0-rc5-00019-g3e330b9 #76 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 2 17:46:57 MSK 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux > > ubuntu@arm64:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0-47 > BogoMIPS : 200.00 > Features : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 atomics > CPU implementer : 0x43 > CPU architecture: 8 > CPU variant : 0x1 > CPU part : 0x0a1 > CPU revision : 0 As an aside, please do not hack up custom /proc/cpuinfo formats. It is a compatibility nightmare for everyone. Mark.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8gST-14i-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1348112 |
On 02/03/16 15:07, Yury Norov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:19:23AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >>> This series add checks to make sure that the AArch32 state is >>> supported before we process the 32bit ID registers. Also >>> checks the same for COMPAT binary execution. ... > > So, everything is looking OK. > > Tested-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Thanks Yury. Suzuki
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web