Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1347029
| From | Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state |
| Date | 2016-03-01 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r801I-6o3-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r60Se-1Sg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > This series add checks to make sure that the AArch32 state is > supported before we process the 32bit ID registers. Also > checks the same for COMPAT binary execution. > > (Painfully) applies on top of 4.5-rc5 + [1] + [2]. > > Or it is available here : > git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git noaarch32/v2-4.5-rc5 > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/410556.html > [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401913.html > > Changes since V1: > - Prevent changing the personality to PER_LINUX32 by adding > wrapper for personality() syscall. > - Add the check to KVM before initialising a AArch32 vcpu > - Tested on hardware. > > Btw, linux32 doesn't complain when the personality() syscall fails to change > to PER_LINUX32. You can verify the personality by running > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > which would still list the 64bit features for the CPUs. Hi Suzuki, I have some troubles with access to appropriate hardware to test it, but I didn't forget. Yury.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-01 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2016-03-02 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: Support for systems without AArch32 state "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-03-02 16:30 +0100
csiph-web