Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1342755 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments.

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments. green@linuxhacker.ru - 2016-02-25 04:20 +0100

#1342755 — [PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments.

From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>

These two comments certainly refer to some ifdefed code that is
no longer present, so remove them too.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
index 210304f..8608b09 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ struct cfs_hash_ops pool_hash_operations = {
 
 };
 
-/* ifdef needed for liblustre support */
 /*
  * pool debugfs seq_file methods
  */
@@ -432,7 +431,6 @@ int lov_pool_new(struct obd_device *obd, char *poolname)
 
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&new_pool->pool_hash);
 
-	/* we need this assert seq_file is not implemented for liblustre */
 	/* get ref for debugfs file */
 	lov_pool_getref(new_pool);
 	new_pool->pool_debugfs_entry = ldebugfs_add_simple(
-- 
2.1.0

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web