[PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments.

From	green@linuxhacker.ru
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments.
Date	2016-02-25 04:20 +0100
Message-ID	<r5UDa-6ag-75@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r5Uts-5ZP-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>

These two comments certainly refer to some ifdefed code that is
no longer present, so remove them too.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
index 210304f..8608b09 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pool.c
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ struct cfs_hash_ops pool_hash_operations = {
 
 };
 
-/* ifdef needed for liblustre support */
 /*
  * pool debugfs seq_file methods
  */
@@ -432,7 +431,6 @@ int lov_pool_new(struct obd_device *obd, char *poolname)
 
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&new_pool->pool_hash);
 
-	/* we need this assert seq_file is not implemented for liblustre */
 	/* get ref for debugfs file */
 	lov_pool_getref(new_pool);
 	new_pool->pool_debugfs_entry = ldebugfs_add_simple(
-- 
2.1.0

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v2 66/84] staging/lustre: Remove misleading liblustre comments. green@linuxhacker.ru - 2016-02-25 04:20 +0100

csiph-web