Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1335773 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify od_update() slightly

Started by"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
First post2016-02-16 21:10 +0100
Last post2016-02-17 06:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify od_update() slightly "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-02-16 21:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify od_update() slightly Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-02-17 06:20 +0100

#1335773 — [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify od_update() slightly

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2016-02-16 21:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify od_update() slightly
Message-ID<r2U6D-4e2-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Drop some lines of code from od_update() by arranging the statements
in there in a more logical way.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c |   11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -175,14 +175,11 @@ static void od_update(struct cpufreq_pol
 		/* No longer fully busy, reset rate_mult */
 		policy_dbs->rate_mult = 1;
 
-		if (!od_tuners->powersave_bias) {
-			__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
-					CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
-			return;
-		}
+		if (od_tuners->powersave_bias)
+			freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy,
+								 freq_next,
+								 CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
 
-		freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy, freq_next,
-					CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
 		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
 	}
 }

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1336056

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2016-02-17 06:20 +0100
Message-ID<r32GR-1JA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1335773
On 16-02-16, 21:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Drop some lines of code from od_update() by arranging the statements
> in there in a more logical way.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c |   11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> @@ -175,14 +175,11 @@ static void od_update(struct cpufreq_pol
>  		/* No longer fully busy, reset rate_mult */
>  		policy_dbs->rate_mult = 1;
>  
> -		if (!od_tuners->powersave_bias) {
> -			__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
> -					CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
> -			return;
> -		}
> +		if (od_tuners->powersave_bias)
> +			freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy,
> +								 freq_next,
> +								 CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
>  
> -		freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy, freq_next,
> -					CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
>  		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
>  	}
>  }

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web