Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1330513 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

Started byLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
First post2016-02-09 18:40 +0100
Last post2016-02-15 00:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-02-09 18:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc  i2c client Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-02-10 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc  i2c client Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-15 00:50 +0100

#1330513 — [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

FromLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date2016-02-09 18:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client
Message-ID<r0kqC-7hS-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
the register of this IP block.

As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
to set client data for rtc i2c client.

Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---
This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.

Changes from V2:
- Rephrase description.
- Added reviewed by.

Changes from V3:
- None, become 5th on series.

Changes from V4:
None

Changes from V5:
None

Changes from V6:
Make this as 4th of series as regmap change applied independently.

 drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
index d959ebb..bda6fd7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
@@ -277,7 +277,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 				"Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-		i2c_set_clientdata(max77686->rtc, max77686);
 
 		max77686->rtc_regmap =
 			devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1331292 — Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2016-02-10 17:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client
Message-ID<r0Fv5-4sd-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1330513
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
> Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
> the register of this IP block.
> 
> As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
> there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
> to set client data for rtc i2c client.
> 
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.
> 
> Changes from V2:
> - Rephrase description.
> - Added reviewed by.
> 
> Changes from V3:
> - None, become 5th on series.
> 
> Changes from V4:
> None
> 
> Changes from V5:
> None
> 
> Changes from V6:
> Make this as 4th of series as regmap change applied independently.
> 
>  drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Appart from the subject line being wrong:

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1333871 — Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Date2016-02-15 00:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc i2c client
Message-ID<r2eAs-1fL-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1330513
On 10.02.2016 02:26, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
> Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
> the register of this IP block.
> 
> As there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() for rtc_i2c client,
> there is no need to store pointer and hence removing the call
> to set client data for rtc i2c client.
> 
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 

FWIW, on max77686:
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web