Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1277839 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-25 23:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-27 00:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> - 2015-11-25 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-26 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 13:10 +0100
[PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach (v2) Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> - 2015-11-26 23:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach (v2) Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 00:50 +0100
| From | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-25 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach |
| Message-ID | <qyQqe-3L8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check to cpuset cgroups, where it belongs.
This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY to Intel CAT cgroups.
Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index f89d929..0603652 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2466,16 +2466,6 @@ static ssize_t __cgroup_procs_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
if (threadgroup)
tsk = tsk->group_leader;
- /*
- * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
- * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
- * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
- */
- if (tsk == kthreadd_task || (tsk->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock_rcu;
- }
-
get_task_struct(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index f0acff0..9fff4d6 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
@@ -1445,6 +1446,17 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
goto out_unlock;
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, tset) {
+ /*
+ * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
+ * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
+ * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
+ */
+ if (task == kthreadd_task ||
+ (task->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
ret = task_can_attach(task, cs->cpus_allowed);
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 09:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach |
| Message-ID | <qyZMS-2jO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1277839 |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 08:01:17PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check to cpuset cgroups, where it belongs. > This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY to Intel CAT cgroups. Looks that's the right place. I tried intel_rdt subsystem at least it doesn't have this restriction anymore (all the tasks can be moved out of the default group), hence: Reviewed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> Chao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach |
| Message-ID | <qz3x8-4VN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1277839 |
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 20:01 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check to cpuset cgroups, where it belongs. But you took the kthreadd check with it. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 23:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach (v2) |
| Message-ID | <qzdmO-2Nc-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1278165 |
Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task checks to cpuset cgroups,
where they belong. This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
tasks to Intel CAT cgroup.
Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
v2: "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check" -> "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task
checks"
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index f89d929..0603652 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2466,16 +2466,6 @@ static ssize_t __cgroup_procs_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
if (threadgroup)
tsk = tsk->group_leader;
- /*
- * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
- * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
- * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
- */
- if (tsk == kthreadd_task || (tsk->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock_rcu;
- }
-
get_task_struct(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index f0acff0..9fff4d6 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
@@ -1445,6 +1446,17 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
goto out_unlock;
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, tset) {
+ /*
+ * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
+ * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
+ * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
+ */
+ if (task == kthreadd_task ||
+ (task->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
ret = task_can_attach(task, cs->cpus_allowed);
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-27 00:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cgroups: move cpuset specific checks from generic code to cpuset_can_attach (v2) |
| Message-ID | <qzesx-3pC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1278474 |
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 20:32 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task checks to cpuset cgroups,
> where they belong. This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
> tasks to Intel CAT cgroup.
>
> Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
>
> v2: "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check" -> "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task
> checks"
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index f89d929..0603652 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -2466,16 +2466,6 @@ static ssize_t __cgroup_procs_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
> if (threadgroup)
> tsk = tsk->group_leader;
>
> - /*
> - * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
> - * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
> - * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
> - */
> - if (tsk == kthreadd_task || (tsk->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_unlock_rcu;
> - }
> -
> get_task_struct(tsk);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index f0acff0..9fff4d6 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> @@ -1445,6 +1446,17 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> goto out_unlock;
>
> cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, tset) {
> + /*
> + * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and become
> + * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
> + * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
> + */
> + if (task == kthreadd_task ||
> + (task->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> ret = task_can_attach(task, cs->cpus_allowed);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock;
Note the rt_runtime reference in the comment, that wasn't about cpuset.
The kthreadd wants to remain immune to all fiddlings methinks.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web